Anticipate resistance to your low-carbon initiative from ‘critical older men’

Internationally, those who oppose government support for green initiatives tend to be older men. The similarity of this pattern between countries suggests that this goes beyond a national, cultural phenomenon – and one hypothesis is that it is to do with the more anti-social values of older men. For cleantech businesses, it is important to understand this demographic since investment risk in cleantech is so closely tied to the political risk of whether specific government green policies get implemented.

‘Why are virtually all climate “sceptics” men?’, was the question posed in a recent article[1] by Richard Black, environment correspondent for the BBC. As part of his discussion he quoted polling evidence from a study produced jointly by the Yale Project on Climate Change and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication[2], which categorised Americans into six groups according to how they felt about climate change; from “Alarmed” through to “Dismissive” – and amongst the Dismissive, almost two-thirds were men (63%). These men are profiled as being:

‘More likely than average to be high income, well-educated, white men... much more likely to be very conservative Republicans... strongly endorse individualistic values, opposing any form of government intervention, anti-egalitarian, and almost universally prefer economic growth over environmental protection ..."

Using a similar approach, our Environmental Choices data strongly supports these findings, and on an international basis. Within the survey we asked a number of questions about how much people agreed with government initiatives to support a green economy – to do with investment, regulation and taxation. Using cluster analysis, we categorised people into six groups according to how supportive they were of these various measures; from “Supporters” (who supported all these types of green measure) through to “Opposers” (who opposed them all). The study was done in Canada and the USA as well as England; and it was quite remarkable how similar the results were for each country. In each country, both the Supporters and Opposers were predominately male, with the four ‘middle groups’ being predominately female. Supporters are more likely to be younger men (aged 18-34), whilst Opposers are more likely to be older men, especially aged 55+. In each country, those men profiled as Opposers would very likely be Conservative/Republican voters, or not politically aligned. Opposers represent 10% of both Canadians and English adults, and 15% of Americans.

Richard Black concludes his article pondering why men are more likely to be dismissive of climate change. It is beyond the scope of our research to provide a robust answer to his question, but the great similarity of the results between countries suggests that this goes beyond a national, cultural phenomenon. One hypothesis is that these views are significantly affected by people’s values. In each country, people’s values do not differ greatly according to some demographics, such as in which region people live, but they do vary greatly by ‘age’ and ‘gender’. In each country, younger adults tend to be more concerned about status-based materialistic values; older women tend to be more content and hospitable whilst middle-aged and older men are more likely to be inhospitable. Perhaps the inhospitable, unsociable values of older men contribute to their resistance to government green initiatives?

I confess, I had an image of ‘grumpy old men’ when we did this analysis; yet resisted this pejorative term since it would distract from a proper understanding of this demographic. It would be interesting to know what drives older men’s critical thinking; and, as the population gets greyer, whether these attitudes are to do with life-stage, or more a one-off characteristic of the Baby Boomer, and pre-Baby Boomer, generations.

But why does this matter to businesses working in the sustainability sector?

It matters because governments need public support to be able to implement suitable green policies, and these policies are critical for cleantech businesses to thrive. Investment risk in cleantech is closely tied to the political risk[3] of whether specific government green policies will be implemented. Which of the various climate change and energy bills, if any, will be adopted by the US Senate? How much will the British government support the energy infrastructure required to enable the electric car to be a success?

As Peter McManners described in a column for Sustainable Business[4], the government’s introduction of feed-in tariffs has meant that PV companies are now struggling to cope with demand. Companies such as SolarCentury are actively incorporating information about feed-in tariffs within their marketing[5].

Certainly, each government initiative to support the low-carbon economy should be critically evaluated. However, we should also be aware that there are some people who would be resistant to any type of government support for the green economy. If there is a specific government policy which will support your cleantech business, don’t be surprised if you get some resistance from some critical older men.

1. COP15: Climate ‘scepticism’ and questions about sex, BBC, Richard Black, 15 December 2009,
   http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/richardblack/2009/12/cop15_questions_about_sex.html
2. Global Warming’s Six Americas; An Audience Segmentation Analysis, By Anthony Leiserowitz, Edward Maibach, Andrew Light; May 19, 2009 -
   http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/05/6americas.html
3. See, for example, Black Rock New Energy Investment Trust plc, Half Yearly Financial Report, 30 April 2009, pages 8 & 9 -
   http://www.blackrock.co.uk/content/groups/uksite/documents/literature/blk047520.pdf
4. Thinking ahead will help an industry to survive and thrive, Peter McManners, Sustainable Business, May 2010
5. http://www.solarcentury.co.uk/News/Solarcentury-News/Farmers-earn-extra-income-with-solar-buildings

This article was originally published in the July 2010 edition of Sustainable Business.

This content was provided by Haddock Research & Branding, Inc. Visit their website at haddock-research.com.

How Climate Change Concern Can Motivate People To Be Interested In Your Offering

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

Climate change is stimulating unmet emotional desires within consumer society. In this study, a simple factual description of a new microgeneration product was presented to respondents - and the best predictor of enthusiasm for the product was whether the individual was very concerned about climate change, or not. As cleantech companies gear up for mass-market roll-out of their low-carbon products, we should expect those most concerned about climate change to be driving early adoption. Read Article »

For your low-carbon product, do you really want to charge people extra for ‘being green’?

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

There is sometimes a sense that green products should be charged at a price premium. But how often is this the right approach? Instead consider, for your green product, whether it can be positioned as being both greener and better value than competitors. Also, think what could be done to enhance each customer’s post-purchase satisfaction. Read Article »

Businesses must think about the unmet needs of their customers

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

When governmental bodies try and get people to reduce their environmental impact, they sometimes talk about an ‘attitude-behaviour gap’. Instead, why not consider it as an ‘unmet need’, where consumers ‘low-carbon desires’ are not met by current ‘high-carbon behaviour’. This should move some of the responsibility away from ‘the consumer’, and onto businesses to think creatively about providing compelling low-carbon products and services. Read Article »

Telepresence companies that employ ‘green positioning’ must do their market testing

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

Some element of green positioning is ubiquitous for telepresence companies, and research shows that this is a real benefit for those business flyers who are very concerned about climate change. In the US, the 30% of business flyers who are Climate Citizens already tend to fly less, and tend to be more interested in telepresence. Yet, telepresence companies also need to consider how to communicate with those less concerned about climate change, how to make their services meet specific business needs, and how to differentiate themselves from their competitors. Read Article »

Monitor the discussion points – and take account of them in your media plans

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

The role of market research is all about providing consumer perspectives to businesses in useful and reliable ways, since the view from the boardroom is almost inevitably different from that of their customers. What may seem consistent and reasonable to Al Gore, may not appear so to some of the public. For companies promoting low-carbon products, the key issue is to take a holistic view of how different types of people will view your communication messages. As a valuable addition to existing strategies, companies should monitor social media forums and take account of discussion points within their media plans. Read Article »

5 Top Tips For Low Carbon Marketing

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

Challenge your assumptions on how to market your low carbon product. 5 top tips based on international primary research data. 28-minute presentation originally delivered to the SustainabilityLive! conference in Birmingham, England on April 21, 2010. Includes introduction about how an Icelandic volcano disrupted our plans, and how we came to use Brainshark. Read Article »

When distance is dead, it pays to consider global patterns first

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

Whilst the communications technologies of 150 years ago helped establish many modern nation states, current technologies are undermining their relevance to business and social affairs. For market intelligence to be useful to business in a world where ‘distance is dead’, it should avoid making single national characterizations, consider global patterns before looking at regional variations, and adopt a detective/problem-solving approach. Read Article »

When it comes to risk, businesses must be more open with their customers

by Peter Winters, President, Haddock Research & Branding

The notion of ‘managing risk’ is a powerful framework for decision-making. What really differentiates how actively people are engaged with climate change is not their awareness or belief in it, but their attitudes towards how the risks should be tackled. Businesses, and governments, are being encouraged to take account of climate change risk. Maplecroft provides global non-financial risks information, and their analysis indicates that companies which are successful in implementing climate change innovations, tend to have better financial performance. Alex Bogusky argues that companies can better manage reputational risk by being more transparent with their customers. Read Article »