White Paper:
Predicting Choice with Conjoint Analysis and Discrete Choice
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Conjoint Analysis and Discrete Choice are popular techniques because they let marketers predict choice behavior. Follow this detailed example from Sawtooth Technologies.
Bringing a new or reconfigured product to market involves a number of complex, interrelated decisions. Marketers must decide what features a product should have, how to price it, and whom to target. And, all of this must be done against a background of anticipated competition. Conjoint analysis has become a popular technique for making these types of decisions because it lets marketers predict choice behavior.
I described the basics of conjoint analysis in, “Understanding Conjoint Analysis in 15 Minutes.” Because I touched only briefly on choice models in that article, I expand on that subject here using the same example. I will describe three of the most widely used models: First Choice, Share of Preference, and Likelihood of Purchase.
Suppose we want to market a new golf ball and have decided that the salient features and feature alternatives are:
Also suppose we have interviewed golfers to determine their preferences for these features. For one buyer these preferences are reflected in the following “utilities:”
A utility has the property that the higher its value, the more desirable its corresponding feature. Utilities can be added to yield a total value for a combination of features.
Suppose we were considering marketing one of two golf balls:
One way to predict which ball our buyer will choose is to add up the buyer’s utilities for each ball; the one with the higher total is expected to be the buyer’s first choice.
Given these two choices, we’d expect our buyer to choose the Long-Life Ball. Repeating this for the 100 buyers in our hypothetical sample, we might get:
We can use this approach to answer “what-if’ questions. For example, suppose we dropped the price of the Distance Ball from $ 1.50 to $ 1.25. Which ball would our buyer prefer? Let’s recompute the totals and see.
This price decrease is enough to make our buyer switch. For the total sample, the results for the lower-price Distance Ball might turn out to be:
We could also look separately at market segments. For example, our sample includes 50 males and 50 females. The split, keeping the Distance Ball at the lower price, might be:
We’d expect the Distance Ball to appeal to men and the Long-Life Ball to appeal to women.
This simple way of simulating behavior, which can be extended to any number of buyers and products, is referred to as the First Choice approach. Although conceptually and computationally simple, the First Choice model has one major drawback: it usually overstates choice for the more popular products. For this reason the Share of Preference model is often a better estimator of choice.
Unlike the First Choice model, which assigns a buyer’s entire purchase to the product with the highest utility, the Share of Preference model splits the probability of purchase among all competing products according to their utilities. Why should this be better? First, it recognizes that buyers do not always purchase the product for which they have the highest utility. And second, many products represent low-involvement purchases for buyers. For these products buyers often have no clear first choice.
To read the rest of this white paper on the Sawtooth Technologies website, click here.
This content was provided by Sawtooth Technologies. Visit their website at www.sawtooth.com.
Other content shared by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Conjoint Analysis: Product Line Strategy
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
In this case study Sawtooth Technologies conducted research into consumer preferences regarding mortgage product lines, modeled preferences for client and competitive products, and recommended an unexpected product strategy. Read Article »
Conjoint Analysis: New Product Selection
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
In this case study Sawtooth Technologies researched a variety of new products to determine which were most likely to succeed and which matched the client’s image/positioning in the financial market. Read Article »
Conjoint Analysis: B2B Customer Service Strategy
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
In this case study Sawtooth Technologies researched the values for service attributes in the channel (brokers, agents and distributors) and with end-customers. Read Article »
Conjoint Analysis: Product Portfolio Optimization
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
In this case study Sawtooth Technologies conducted research into consumer preferences regarding various features and pricing of online classified ads. The objective was to develop an “optimal” product line that would increase sales volume. Read Article »
Conjoint Analysis: Staff Training
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
This report describes the process of teaching a client proper execution of a conjoint study to enable them to conduct their own studies in the future. Sawtooth Technologies trained the client's staff on multiple teaching points and illuminated distinct market segments for the client to focus on. Read Article »
Understanding Conjoint in 15 Minutes
by Joseph Curry, President, Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
This white paper arms you with the basics of conjoint analysis using a simple example. Read Article »
Finding the Sweet Spot of Competitive Positioning
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
The sweet spot of competitive positioning ensures your brand is relevant to the target audience and differentiated from the competition. This article from Sawtooth Technologies pinpoints ways to position your brand, particularly in the business-to-business market. Read Article »
Knowing when the Price is Right
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Research on pricing products and services, obviously popular, can bring successful results through several different research methodologies: find the right one for you. Read Article »
MaxDiff – maximum power to act on market preferences
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Determining preferences in product features or benefits, marketing slogans, logos, service options, or even restaurant names, allows for trial and error without the error. Read Article »
Segmenting for Success
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Segmenting for success in both consumer and B2B markets means going beyond traditional segmenting variables, such as demographics or company type, and focusing on needs, attitudes and lifestyle. In this article Sawtooth Technologies highlights the benefits, approach, and uses of segmenting a market in such a way. Read Article »
Discrete Choice Analysis Makes Comparing Apples to Oranges Possible
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Discrete choice lets you understand how your market makes relevant apples to oranges comparisons. Sawtooth Technologies provides an example question for this type of scenario. Read Article »
Predicting Revenue from Conjoint Results
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Conjoint analysis is a powerful tool for predicting market reaction to changes in existing products or services or completely new products. But how well do conjoint model results translate into real world results? And can you predict revenue from conjoint results? Read Article »
Aligning Your Line: Using Conjoint to Manage Product Lines
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
It is common to think about using conjoint / discrete choice to configure products and test pricing, but it also extremely useful for finding opportunities to shrink product lines, testing whether additional products cannibalize or add to preference, and uncovering segments and aligning products with their preferences. Read Article »
MaxDiff: A New Way to Prioritize Benefit Statements
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
MaxDiff is a great methodology for prioritizing benefit statements. You’ll learn which statements resonate most with your market in this article. Read Article »
Conjoint/Discrete Choice Model Output: What’s the Share About?
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
When business decision-makers look at conjoint and discrete choice model output, how should the share results be interpreted and used? In this post, we share our thoughts about preference share and market share, based on decades of practical experience. Read Article »
Asking Discrete Choice Questions When the Answer is, “It Depends”
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Discrete choice questions are typically straightforward – “Which product do you prefer?” However, in some situations, the respondent may be thinking, “It depends.” This article describes these situations and some possible solutions. Read Article »
Using Discrete Choice and MaxDiff to Spend HR Dollars Wisely
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Especially in times of shrinking budgets, it is critically important to allocate benefits dollars wisely. Human Resources departments have the opportunity to use customer-focused approaches to maximize ROI. Techniques such as Discrete Choice Analysis and MaxDiff can help companies maximize employee satisfaction for each dollar spent. Read Article »
Why I Still Love Conjoint
by Sawtooth Technologies Consulting Group
Conjoint analysis, also referred to as discrete choice, has been in use for decades. What has led to its popularity? Why does it keep researchers, academicians, and research end-users engaged? In short, why do we still love conjoint? Read Article »
