Segmentation Success

This paper explains the basic building blocks of the segmentation process and its implementation.

Segmentation research can provide your organization with a unique and competitively advantageous perspective on the marketplace. In practice, however, such studies can involve significant time and effort, and what constitutes a winning solution is not always clear. The benefits can be great, but the risks can be too.

So how do you avoid the common pitfalls of segmentation research and produce a useful, lasting outcome for your clients? No one approach is foolproof, but you can greatly enhance your odds of success by understanding and implementing a process-based approach to segmentation - one that begins with client needs and ends with an actionable, objectives-focused set of segments.

This article is meant to explain the basic building blocks of the segmentation process, and to provide you with a roadmap for implementation that will be of help regardless of industry or subject matter. These fundamental steps, more than any one technique or methodology, will determine the success of your research efforts and ultimately will influence management’s perspective on the value of market research.

From the start, think about the finish

Successful segmentation research is heavily dependent upon buy-in from your clients, so it makes sense to seek their input right from the start. Work to clarify the objectives they have for this research, and take the time to understand the resources at their disposal. Brainstorm with them before writing a questionnaire or defining variables for use in your analysis, in an effort to answer two important questions.

• What is the ideal way to divide consumers for marketing purposes? Demographic groupings, attitudinal questions, and behavioral data all have advantages and disadvantages depending on what your clients see as “ideal” segments.
• What information is needed to best enable marketing action? Specifically, what data are needed to most help your clients target prospects, assemble offers, and communicate benefits to consumers within the various segments that are developed.

Segmenting and Profiling: Two Distinct Tasks

There is no guarantee, of course, that the final analysis of results will perfectly reproduce this view of the marketplace. Visualizing the end game, however, allows you and your clients to create a set of guiding principles that will inform the remainder of the project, and this in turn will ensure results that are as actionable as possible.

Focus the questionnaire design process

Segmentation research can be performed solely using variables available within a company’s customer database. Frequently, though, client objectives require the collection of information not already in hand, and in these cases a questionnaire is needed.

It is likely to be lengthy, since for practical reasons segmentation studies commonly perform double duty as comprehensive market profiling exercises. The important thing to remember is that your ability to identify actionable groups of consumers will be closely tied to the nature of variables available, not just the number used. Ideally every question should somehow serve the goals of your segmentation effort. As the person guiding the research, ask yourself repeatedly: would this be a useful way to think about how consumers may differ in the marketplace? And, will this information help us market to different customer segments? If the answer to both of these is no, then that variable probably should not be included in the final questionnaire.

Also remember that the structure of questions can have great impact on your final solution. For example, asking consumers “How likely are you to purchase this service?” will produce different results than asking “Are you likely to purchase this service?” In the end, the principles that define the segmentation study should be referenced to decide upon wording that is most appropriate.

Carefully select variables for the analysis

It is not wise to include all possible survey and database variables in the segmentation analysis, regardless of technique used. This “kitchen sink” approach will only muddy the waters of analysis, and needlessly complicate your primary task: finding segments that are meaningful, reachable and strategically advantageous.

At the same time, excluding a potentially important variable can also hinder the discovery of useful segments. It is therefore important to have a structured process for choosing which variables will be used to define segments and which will serve to profile segments. The following rules of thumb may be of help.

• In general, it can be counterproductive to mix demographic and attitudinal variables in the same segmentation.
• You should take steps to limit the number of variables included in the analysis. Commonly a handful of critical questions will form the backbone of your most useful solution.
• It is wise to consider questions where variation exists in the data. On their face, these highlight points of differentiation in the marketplace.
• Try and avoid including two or more questions that appear to serve the same analytic purpose.

Test the utility of the segmentation

Segmentation analysis will yield one or more possible solutions to evaluate and you will be called upon to decide which is most useful. Surprise! There is no simple formula for determining the ideal segmentation scheme. The key, rather, is to systematically examine the profile of each segment and build a business case in support of the ideal solution. In doing so, consider the following important questions.

• Can members of attractive segments be easily identified in the marketplace, or are they based only on information that is easily collected via survey research but not readily available otherwise?
• Are one or more segments particularly attractive and/or lucrative? Conversely, are there one or two consumer groups that can be eliminated as attractive marketing prospects, or at least relegated to a low priority tier of attention?
• Are these segments based on variables readily available in the company database, so that we can (if desired) assign current customers to one or the other grouping?

As a rule of thumb, useful segments tend to incorporate 10 percent or more of the population. It is also possible, however, to find lucrative segments that are very small. In the end, your winning solution should focus attention on groupings that are easily reached, effective at identifying the most and least attractive targets, and based on information that can be used in the future to group consumers based on segment membership.

Apply your solution to the marketplace

If the overarching goal of segmentation research is to sort consumers into distinct and meaningful “types” for marketing purposes, then it follows that such studies should provide you with the means of finding these types moving forward. Classification models can be created that use a short list of variables to effectively determine segment membership. Armed with this tool, you can bridge the gap between marketing research and marketing action and - in the process - strengthen the argument for conducting such projects in the future.

You may use a classification model to place new customers into segments at sign-up, to sharpen customer acquisition efforts, or to track segment membership over time. Or, you may identify different applications for this model based on your clients’ needs. Regardless, developing a classification model will help promote the segmentation study within your organization, provide staying power for the hard-found results, and help demonstrate the practical benefits of market research to others in your organization.

Educate yourself to the various techniques available for finding segments

A number of segmentation techniques have developed over time, each with a unique way of finding segments. None of them can be thought of as the “best” approach, and you may find it useful to compare and contrast solutions from multiple methods. It is therefore helpful to have a broad understanding of the options available. These are described briefly below.

• Clustering techniques array respondents in multi-dimensional space, and then group them based on proximity. This family of techniques is clearly the most traditional form of segmentation analysis, and can be broadly divided into two types: hierarchical clustering (which provides a range of segment solutions from which to choose) and non-hierarchical or k-means clustering (where you specify the number of segments to be created).
• Latent class modeling (LCM) is the only technique that offers a strong statistical basis for segmenting data because, unlike other methods, it is model-based. Therefore its fit can be evaluated like other statistical methods such as regression. In simple terms, LCM works from the assumption that data sets, as a whole, consist of different distributions mixed together. It then proceeds to unmix them, in the process uncovering unique consumer segments.
• Self-organizing maps (SOMs) represent a neural network-based technique. In it, respondents are introduced one at a time to an initially blank map. As each record is presented to the map, the dominant patterns in the data are learned and segments are created.
• Tree-based algorithms such as CHAID are particularly useful when a target or dependent variable is available in the data. If, for example, the acceptance of a direct mail offer represents a desired outcome, a segmentation scheme can be derived that first identifies what distinguishes acceptors from non-acceptors. The data set can then be further split into segments within these umbrella categories - a process that can continue until an optimal number of segments are obtained.

There is much more detail available in the literature on each of these techniques. It is important to remember, however, that the success or failure of your segmentation effort will hinge primarily on the processes you have in place, not the technique selected. It is smart to know your analytic options, but even the most advanced technique will not prove effective without careful planning, questionnaire design, and variable selection.

Lead to success

Segmentation research involves many steps, and a host of choices along the way. Managing this process is never easy, but there are ways to ensure that your hard work will lead to success.

Involve your clients from the beginning, and clearly understand what they hope to gain from the research. Work with them to understand critical data needs, and craft an efficient questionnaire where all information gathered directly serves the purposes of asegmentation. Use profiling as a tool to find attractive targets in the marketplace, and to enable marketing action in a way that is consistent with the resources available to your organization. Give users a tool for classifying consumers into segments in a way that demonstrates the business impact of research. All the while remember that managing a successful segmentation project means providing your clients with a solution they can understand and act upon.

This content was provided by TRC. Visit their website at www.trchome.com.

Tweet

Better Questions For Segmentation: Use of MAX-DIFF

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Using Maximum Difference Scaling as a method in designing surveys may ensure more useful results in your market research. It is a comparative method based on importance that sidesteps the problems associated with traditional importance scales. TRC explains the mechanics behind this method through a detailed example in this white paper. Read Article »

Database Scoring with Object Based Segmentation

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Segmentation created from company databases are often lacking the rich segmentation schemes formed by attitudinal surveys. A new approach is Object based segmentation that uses database variables at the basis for forming attitudinal segments, leaving both markets classifiable with clear demographic segments. TRC compares traditional segmentation analysis with Object based. Read Article »

Asymmetry in Product Features: Use of the Kano Method

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

The presence or absence of product features strongly affect consumer satisfaction with the design. Comparing these features using asymmetry analysis can help identify satisfiers and dissatisfiers from among the features of a product. The Kano method is similar but results in categorizing each respondent's answers. TRC presents this essential method of deciding new product features in detail. Read Article »

Conjoint Analysis versus Self-Explicated Method: A Comparison

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Determining feature importance in a product can be divided into two techniques - top-down methods where a customer evaluates the whole product at once, and bottum-up methods where features are evaluated individually or in sets. The former method, Conjoint Analysis, is more common while the latter method, Self-Explicated Method, is not widely used but has practical advantages. TRC compares the two methods in this white paper. Read Article »

Product Configurator

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

To help customers purchase the right product, companies often use product configurators - tools that let customers design their purchase before ordering. This method is employed as a market research technique, similar to conjoint analysis but without some of the constrictions. This white paper from TRC explains an appropriate use of the product configurator method. Read Article »

Market Segmentation: One Method, Four Examples

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Effective market segmentation requires an understanding of the market and the skilled art of finding the appropriate segments. TRC gives four examples of this method's application with results. Read Article »

How to Measure the Value of a Brand

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Brand name evokes an inherent value; finding a way to reliably measure that value is crucial in determining product development. A technique called discrete choice conjoint analysis is described in this paper by TRC. Read Article »

Deriving Value from Research: the Use of Conjoint Analysis for Product Development

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Marketing research has been used by firms over the last several decades to provide information for decision making. Over time, increasingly sophisticated statistical methods have been developed and deployed in the service of this goal. This article focuses on one such method - conjoint analysis - and its application to product development. Read Article »

Cluster Analysis Gets Complicated

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Segmentation studies using cluster analysis have become commonplace. However, the data may be affected by collinearity, which can have a strong impact and affect the results of the analysis unless addressed. This article investigates what level presents a problem, why it's a problem, and how to get around it. Simulated data allows a clear demonstration of the issue without clouding it with extraneous factors. Read Article »

Identifying Feature Importance: A Comparison of Methods

by TRC

Understanding what customers want is fundamental to the new product development process as well as to the process of keeping existing products fresh and relevant. To be successful in this area we need to be able to correctly identify what features are important to consumers. Feature importance can be measured using a variety of methods of differing effectiveness. In this paper we will deal with the following methods: Importance Scales, Pick data, Pairwise Comparisons, and Max-Diff. Read Article »

Monadic Price Testing vs. Price Laddering

by TRC

Compares two popular pricing methods to understand the difference in take rate information. Read Article »

New Product Development: Stages and Methods

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

TRC identifies the best methods for each stage of the product development process, from Idea Generation through Feature Development, Product Development and Product Testing. Read Article »

Understand Choice in Banking: Use of Discrete Choice Conjoint Analysis

by TRC

Conjoint analysis provides incentive for survey respondents to determine which features must not be omitted in their final purchase. The method closely mirrors decision-making in the real world, and as shown by TRC in this white paper, is applicable to many situations including how customers choose their bank. Read Article »

Want better product ideas? Try smart incentives

by Rajan Samandam, TRC

Idea generation from survey respondents is strongly dependent on incentive. Introducing competition strengthens the quantity and quality of creative responses. TRC provides examples of smart incentives in this white paper. Read Article »

An alternative method of reporting customer satisfaction scores

by Rajan Sambandam and George Hausser of TRC

Though customer satisfaction evaluations are widely used, reporting of these scores has varied from one study to another. This is likely the result of each method’s advantages and disadvantages, as well as the personal preferences and habits of the researcher. In this article we review various reporting methods and outline our method with an example. Read Article »

Identifying the Key Drivers of Brand Image

by TRC

Measuring brand image requires looking at direct effects as well as indirect effects of a company's performance. TRC compares traditional multiple regression with SatiscanTM, a method that can review all possible path models. Read Article »

Improving Call Satisfaction: A Case Study

by TRC

TRC presents a case study of analyzing and improving a call center as an on-going data collection process. Read Article »

Improving Claim Satisfaction: A Case Study

by TRC

A case study on applying full-service market research to help an insurance company improve their client satisfaction with claim handling. Read Article »

Non-Response Bias In Survey Sampling

by TRC

Market research accounts for many scenarios to ensure high quality of data. One of the most overlooked problems is non-response bias. TRC describes ways to reduce its effects through survey design and data adjustment in this white paper. Read Article »

Survey of Analysis Methods Part I

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

Practical marketing research deals with two major problems: identifying key drivers and developing segments. In this two-part series TRC looks at key driver analysis and segmentation. Read Article »

Survey of Analysis Methods Part II

by Rajan Sambandam, TRC

This is Part II of a series looking at aspects of practical marketing research: identifying key drivers and developing segments. This content describes specific segmentation methods: cluster analysis, neural networks, self-organizing map (SOM), and mixture models. Included is a discussion on ideas for developing good segments. Read Article »

Validating Satiscan Using A Split Sample Approach

by TRC

TRC's SatiscanTM model is tested for validity using call center data and a split sample approach. This shows that SatiscanTM produces similar models when run on random halves of an energy industry dataset. Read Article »

Satiscan and Regression Analysis: A Comparison

by TRC

The comparison shows the advantages of SatiscanTM, an analytical method from TRC, over regression in identifying the correct and cost efficient action steps. Read Article »

TURF: New Methods for Implementation

by Westley Ritz, TRC

TURF is a long-established and quite useful marketing research tool, but not everyone is familiar with how it works, or with the latest developments that can make TURF even more effective. The purposes of this paper are twofold: (1) to explain the technique and (2) to describe the latest methods for implementation. Read Article »

Product Configuration: A Research Approach for the Times

by Rajan Sambandam & Pankaj Kumar, TRC

The marketplace has shifted in the last decade with the ability of consumers to configure the product they want. This white paper explains the basics of configuration, an approach that mimics the real world of customer driven product design to obtain insight into consumer decision-making. Read Article »

Product Configuration: Evidence for Effectiveness

by Rajan Sambandam & Pankaj Kumar, TRC

This white paper looks at the examples from one product configuration study, the kinds of information that can be derived and the possibilities provided by statistical analysis. Read Article »

New Product Research: A Dynamic Approach to Feature Prioritization

by Pankaj Kumar, Westley Ritz and Rajan Sambandam of TRC

Feature prioritization is a very common new product research problem. Over the last few years, the most popular technique has been Max-Diff. However, as the number of features increases it becomes difficult to use. Bracket is a tournament-based approach that produces Max-Diff like results and can easily prioritize fifty or more features. Read Article »

Doing More with Less: Getting Greater Value from Mobile Quant

by TRC

What “more with less” means with respect to mobile MR, and examples from traditional online studies to challenge existing assumptions about what will and will not work on a mobile device. Read Article »

How to measure the value of a brand?

by TRC

Knowing how to price your product that you can optimize your ROI is key. This video explains various ways to measure the value of a brand and talks about a discrete choice conjoint technique as a perfect approach to measuring the value of a brand. Read Article »

Product Configuration with Michael Sosnowski

by TRC

Consider a person who wants to buy a personal computer. The customer can select exactly the combination desired, subject to a price constraint. Would it be possible to use such a process for research? Read Article »

How to Improve Your Market Segmentation

by TRC

Bob Hull from TRC talks about a market research technique for market segmentation and ways of improving them. Read Article »

Rich Raquet Market Research Consulting

by TRC

Rich Raquet is introducing TRC, a research & analytics firm, specializing in new product research, conjoint, segmentation, brand equity, sat & loyalty. Read Article »