Question 1

How should we monitor incidence and LOI live across markets?

Accepted Answer

You can monitor incidence rate and LOI (Length of Interview) in real time by using a centralized fieldwork dashboard that aggregates data from all markets. Modern survey platforms and panel providers often offer live reporting tools where you can see key stats like qualification rates (incidence) and average survey duration (LOI) by country as responses come in. If you're using multiple panels or agencies, make sure they feed into one interface so you aren't juggling separate reports. Also consider setting up alerts for anomalies — if one market's incidence drops too low or LOI spikes due to translation issues, you'll know immediately and can intervene. The goal is to have a single, live view of field progress across regions so you can troubleshoot sampling or questionnaire issues early and ensure consistent data quality worldwide.

Question 2

Are path-to-purchase studies relevant outside of brick-and-mortar retail?

Accepted Answer

Absolutely--path-to-purchase studies are just as relevant in e-commerce and service industries as they are in brick-and-mortar retail. Any time customers go through a decision journey (from initial awareness to evaluation to decision and purchase), mapping that path yields useful insights. In online contexts, a path-to-purchase study might track how a consumer moves from seeing a digital ad, to reading reviews, to comparing options on a website, and finally to checkout. Even for B2B or non-retail services, understanding the sequence of touchpoints (such as referrals, white papers or demos, and sales calls) is crucial. The principles remain the same: identify where customers get information, what influences them, and any friction points before purchase. So while the specific touchpoints differ, studying the purchase journey is universally valuable for tailoring marketing and removing barriers to conversion.

Question 3

How is digital exclusion affecting research access to certain populations?

Accepted Answer

Digital exclusion — the fact that not everyone has reliable internet or digital skills — is creating blind spots in research by making certain populations harder to reach. When studies rely on online surveys, communities, or mobile apps, groups like some older adults, rural residents, or lower-income households with limited internet access often get underrepresented. For example, if you conduct an online-only poll, you might miss input from seniors who aren't tech-savvy or from people in areas without broadband, skewing your results toward more connected demographics. This challenge is forcing researchers to adapt methods. Many projects now use mixed-mode sampling: combining online data collection with telephone interviews, mailed surveys, or in-person outreach specifically to include those offline individuals. It can add time and cost, but it's crucial for getting a truly representative sample. In short, digital exclusion is turning into a data exclusion issue — reminding us that to capture insights from all segments of the population, we need to bridge the gap with alternative recruitment and research modes.

Question 4

How do neuro signals forecast long-term memory and repeat purchase?

Accepted Answer

Certain neuro signals measured during consumer testing--like indicators of strong memory encoding or emotional engagement--have been linked to a higher likelihood of long-term brand recall and even repeat purchasing behavior. In practice, neuromarketing researchers might use EEG or other biometrics to see if an ad or experience is triggering brain responses (for example, activity patterns associated with memory formation) that indicate information is "sticking." If a stimulus creates a spike in those memory-encoding signals, it suggests consumers are more likely to remember the product or message later on. That sustained memory can translate to behavior: when it comes time to buy again, the consumer recalls the brand positively and is more inclined to choose it. In essence, by revealing which marketing content embeds itself in memory, these neuro metrics help predict which messages will drive repeat purchase and loyalty down the line.

Question 5

How risky are idioms and humor in cross-market concept testing?

Accepted Answer

Idioms and humor are risky in cross-market concept testing because they often don't translate well and can cause confusion or offense. A catchphrase that's hilarious and engaging in one language may lose its meaning or impact when translated, since it likely relies on local references or values not shared elsewhere. Even humor styles differ--sarcasm or wordplay might be appreciated in one culture but fall completely flat in another. If a concept's appeal hinges on a joke or idiom, you risk very skewed feedback internationally: people might dislike it not because the idea is bad, but because the expression doesn't resonate. It's generally safer to test a more universal version of the concept across markets, or be ready to adapt the creative language per locale if the core idea is strong.

eye square Inc.

Why choose Us

What is eye square Inc.?

Research Software and Platform Details

Market Research Products

System 0 Live InContext social media ad testing

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How should we monitor incidence and LOI live across markets?

Are path-to-purchase studies relevant outside of brick-and-mortar retail?

How is digital exclusion affecting research access to certain populations?

How do neuro signals forecast long-term memory and repeat purchase?

How risky are idioms and humor in cross-market concept testing?