July 25, 2012

We need more contrarians and curmudgeons!

Conferences have become so specialized that only the faithful are likely to attend. Are we missing out on important debates?

In his Survey Geek blog Reg Baker bemoans the rise of storytelling at conferences, and the decline of rigour and evidence. However, I beg to differ with Reg. The problem (IMHO) is not the presence of storytelling, nor even a disassociation from the facts. The weakness is created by the absence of dissent and contested debate.

The process of dialectics, where opposing points of view are put forwarded and argued for in debate is great way of seeking clarity and understanding – especially if people stick to a few basic rules, such as evidence trumping opinion and avoiding such devices as men of straw.

When market research only had a few conferences, everybody who had the resources and the motivation went to these events, organised by the likes of ESOMAR, CASRO, MRS etc. At most of these events there was a variety of views, from the curmudgeon and the luddite to the innovator and the dedicated seeker of fashion.

Now we have specialist media, specialist channels, and specialist conferences. At a conference on neuromarketing, or behavioural economics, or mobile research, the people most likely to attend are the faithful, and perhaps the gullible, and the dialectics don’t take place. These specialist channels and events lead to more information, but perhaps at the costs of rigour?

I think that what we need are more contrary people at these events. Indeed there may be a future in hiring curmudgeons to attend events to play the role of shouting out when the emperor has no clothes (or in modern parlance when the guru’s clothes are virtual). Perhaps Reg and I should consider a new career as evidence-based naysayers? (for hire!)

state of the industry

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

More from Ray Poynter

Word Cloud Plus Extracts Hot Buzz Topics

Word Cloud Plus Extracts Hot Buzz Topics

The GRIT data collected toward the end of 2022 included 918 open-ended replies to the question “Related to insights, research, or analytics, which top...

Observational Data Has Problems. Are Researchers Aware of Them?
Research Methodologies

Observational Data Has Problems. Are Researchers Aware of Them?

Observational data is a tempting shortcut for insights but researchers must consider its potential shortfalls

Company Size Matters: The Differential Impact of COVID-19

Company Size Matters: The Differential Impact of COVID-19

A deep dive into the very different experiences of the MRX community during COVID-19.

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers