Question 1

What's a clean plan to test migration from legacy systems?

Accepted Answer

A clean plan to test migrating from legacy systems is to use a phased approach: start with a small-scale pilot in a safe environment, verify everything works, then expand gradually. For example, you might begin by migrating a subset of data or a single department's usage to the new system in a test environment that mirrors production. This pilot lets you check data integrity (ensuring nothing is lost or corrupted during conversion), system performance, and whether all functionalities and integrations behave as expected. Make sure to have clear success criteria (like system response times, error rates, data accuracy) and a rollback plan if any critical issues arise. If the pilot goes smoothly, proceed to migrate in stages — moving one module or business unit at a time, rather than a big bang cutover. After each phase, validate the results and gather user feedback to address any hiccups before the next wave. By testing in controlled increments, you minimize risk and ensure the final full migration is smooth and well-vetted.

Question 2

What's a clean plan to validate laddering from benefit to values?

Accepted Answer

To validate a laddering sequence (from product benefits up to personal values), follow up with a quantitative study designed to test those links across a larger sample. Take the laddering insights you found qualitatively (e.g., Feature X provides Benefit Y, which connects to Value Z) and turn them into survey questions or statements. For example, ask respondents how important Benefit Y is to them and separately measure how strongly they care about Value Z or believe the product delivers on that value. Then use statistical analysis — correlations, regressions, or even structural equation modeling — to see if people who rate Benefit Y highly also place high importance on Value Z. You could also use a choice-based approach: present scenarios or messaging that emphasize the benefit versus the underlying value and see if the preferences line up as the ladder predicts. Make sure your sample is large enough to check consistency across segments. By quantitatively confirming that each step (attribute â†' benefit â†' value) is correlated in the expected way, you provide hard evidence that the laddering insights hold true broadly.

Question 3

When should operational data feed CX dashboards directly without other analysis?

Accepted Answer

Feed operational data directly into CX dashboards only when the metrics are straightforward, reliable, and actionable without additional interpretation. If a metric is simple and well-understood — like daily NPS scores, website uptime, or call center wait times — and it needs real-time visibility, plugging it in live makes sense so teams can respond immediately. Operational figures that are unlikely to be misinterpreted (for example, the number of support tickets open) can be shown raw, because stakeholders know what to do with that information at a glance. The key is that the audience can grasp the significance without an analyst: if the data might be misleading or lacks context (say a drop in satisfaction that could be due to a one-off event), it shouldn't be on a dashboard unannotated. In short, reserve direct feeds for clear, action-oriented metrics and route more nuanced data through analysis before it hits the CX dashboard.

Question 4

Is mobile research mainly useful for younger consumers?

Accepted Answer

Mobile research is valuable well beyond just young consumers, as smartphone use is now common among older demographics too. While it's true that Gen Z and Millennials are heavily mobile-centric — often preferring to answer surveys or diaries on their phones — research shows that middle-aged and senior consumers increasingly participate via mobile when the design is accessible. In fact, reaching certain groups during their daily routines (like busy parents or on-the-go professionals) may be easiest through mobile apps or texts regardless of age. The key is to tailor the mobile research experience (e.g. using clear large text and simple interfaces) so that even less tech-savvy participants feel comfortable. Mobile has become a mainstream data collection channel, so assuming it's mainly useful for younger people is outdated. Instead, researchers use mobile to capture in-the-moment feedback across age groups, deploying other modes only for those who truly can't or won't use smartphones.

Question 5

Which disclosures satisfy clients when AI edits respondent media?

Accepted Answer

Clients expect clear disclosures whenever AI is used to edit respondent media — explaining what was changed and assuring that the content's meaning is intact. For instance, if you use an AI tool to transcribe and clean up interview videos, your report might note: "Transcripts were generated and lightly edited for clarity using AI, then verified by researchers for accuracy." Such transparency about AI's role (be it noise reduction in audio, blurring faces for privacy, or summarizing long responses) helps clients trust the results. It's also wise to offer access to original recordings or raw transcripts if needed, so clients know nothing important was lost or altered. In short, a brief methodology section listing any AI-assisted edits — along with human oversight steps taken — will satisfy clients that the respondent input remains authentic and reliable despite the editing.

InterQ Research LLC

Why choose Us

What is InterQ Research LLC?

Recognition

Services and Expertise

Published on Greenbook

Online Versus In-Person Focus Groups

Client Projects and Success Stories

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

What's a clean plan to test migration from legacy systems?

What's a clean plan to validate laddering from benefit to values?

When should operational data feed CX dashboards directly without other analysis?

Is mobile research mainly useful for younger consumers?

Which disclosures satisfy clients when AI edits respondent media?