Question 1

How can healthcare research better capture caregiver perspectives?

Accepted Answer

Healthcare researchers can capture caregiver perspectives by deliberately involving caregivers in studies and designing research to address their experiences. Instead of gathering data only from patients or providers, progressive studies now include surveys and interviews directed at family members or others who care for the patient day-to-day. The questions might cover topics like caregiver stress, what challenges they face coordinating care, or how a treatment plan affects their daily routine. Another approach is having caregivers keep diaries or use mobile apps to log observations over time, which provides nuanced context about the patient's condition and the caregiver's role that one-off surveys might miss. By analyzing these inputs alongside patient outcomes, researchers can uncover insights — for instance, how caregiver involvement influences recovery or adherence to treatment. In short, truly patient-centered research accounts for the caregiver's voice, leading to more holistic healthcare insights and interventions that support the entire care circle.

Question 2

How do I know if AI has reliably coded thousands of short mobile entries?

Accepted Answer

You can determine if an AI has reliably coded thousands of short mobile survey entries by spot-checking and benchmarking its results against human judgment. A practical approach is to take a random sample of the AI-coded responses (say 5-10% of them) and have experienced human analysts recode those independently. If the AI's categories or tags largely match what people would assign, that's a good sign of reliability; significant discrepancies indicate problems. Also examine consistency and outliers: for example, check if the AI put an unusual number of entries into a single category or created any nonsensical groupings, which might reveal errors. Whenever possible, compare the AI's output to known results (like a previous study's hand-coded data or a predetermined ground truth subset) to quantify accuracy. By auditing the AI's work with human eyes and simple statistics, you'll gain confidence in whether its coding is trustworthy at scale.

Question 3

What kinds of purchase decisions are typically made below the C-level?

Accepted Answer

Plenty of significant purchase decisions happen at managerial or team levels rather than the C-suite. Operational and departmental buys - like choosing a new software tool, research service, or vendor for a specific project - are often made by directors or managers who directly use those solutions. For instance, an IT manager might select a cybersecurity software, a marketing director could decide on a social media analytics platform, or a procurement manager might choose among packaging suppliers, all without CEO involvement as long as they're within budget policy. These professionals have the expertise and day-to-day context, so companies empower them to make specialized decisions. Even strategic initiatives can start below C-level: a product team might greenlight a pilot with a new technology before it ever reaches the executive review. Typically, the C-suite sets overall budget and strategy, but relies on mid-level leaders to evaluate options and execute purchases that align with those goals. That's why B2B sellers often target communications and demos to these influencers and users, not just the executives.

Question 4

What practices help ensure surveys reach the right B2B decision-makers?

Accepted Answer

To ensure surveys reach the right B2B decision-makers, use targeted recruitment and screening practices that zero in on specific roles and industry criteria. Start by defining your ideal respondent (e.g. CFOs at mid-size companies, or IT managers who influence software purchases) and then use channels that specifically access those professionals. B2B research panels or professional networks like LinkedIn can be invaluable. Many offer filters to invite participants by title, seniority, and sector, which helps avoid wasting invites on non-decision-makers. Craft screening questions in the survey itself that confirm each respondent's role and authority (for instance, asking if they sign off on budget or what job title best describes them), and disqualify those who don't fit. It's also important to frame the survey communication in a way that appeals to busy executives: a concise explanation of why their input matters and possibly an incentive relevant to their field can boost participation. By combining precise targeting with verification at the survey start, you greatly increase the odds that your B2B survey data comes from true decision-makers rather than the wrong crowd.

Question 5

How do I measure ROI from a dashboard program beyond usage metrics?

Accepted Answer

To measure the ROI of a dashboard program beyond usage metrics, tie the dashboard's use to tangible business outcomes. Identify where using the dashboard led to better decisions, time savings, or improved results, and put numbers on those benefits. For example, if the marketing team spotted an underperforming campaign via the dashboard and tweaked it to achieve a 10% sales lift, estimate the revenue gained and credit a portion of that to the dashboard insight. Or say the dashboard automated a monthly report that used to take analysts two days--calculate the value of those saved labor hours. You can also collect specific cases from users: maybe a manager avoided losing a key client because a dashboard alert prompted timely intervention, which you translate into revenue retained. Add up these instances of added revenue, cost savings, or efficiency gains. Then compare that total benefit to what you spend on the dashboard program. Presenting those before-and-after impacts in dollar terms will show clearly that the dashboard program is paying for itself (and then some).

Vault Consulting

Why choose Us

What is Vault Consulting?

Services and Expertise