Question 1

How do I prove ROI from investing in decentralized clinical trials?

Accepted Answer

To prove ROI on decentralized clinical trials (DCTs), connect the approach to tangible improvements in trial efficiency and outcomes that have dollar values. Start by quantifying time and cost gains: for example, if using remote monitoring and local clinics shortened patient recruitment by three months, calculate the savings in operational costs and the earlier drug-launch revenue that faster timeline enables. Similarly, track retention and data quality--if decentralized methods reduce dropout rates or allow more diverse patients to participate, note how that avoids expensive re-recruitment or enhances the trial's chance of regulatory success. Show concrete before-and-after comparisons where investing in DCT technology or logistics yielded a trial that was cheaper, faster, or more inclusive than a traditional site-based trial. Finally, combine those metrics with qualitative benefits (like improved patient experience leading to better compliance) to create a well-rounded ROI case. By translating DCT efficiencies into cost savings and potential revenue gains, you clearly demonstrate its return on investment.

Question 2

When should local qual be used to resolve conflicting global quant signals?

Accepted Answer

You should turn to local qualitative research when your global quantitative data shows puzzling or conflicting results that you can't fully explain with numbers alone. If a global survey or dataset has outliers or opposite trends in specific markets (for instance, one country's satisfaction scores dropped while others rose), it's a sign that local context needs to be explored qualitatively. In such cases, conducting focus groups or in-depth interviews in the particular region helps uncover cultural nuances or specific issues behind the anomaly. Local qual is also useful when stakeholders are unsure why a metric is underperforming in one area despite overall positive global averages. By hearing directly from local customers or employees, researchers can find the "why" that the spreadsheet data is missing. In summary, whenever the what of the data (the numbers) doesn't line up across regions, local qual should be deployed to clarify the why.

Question 3

How should we recruit IT buyers by role, influence, and budget control?

Accepted Answer

Recruiting IT buyers effectively means targeting the right mix of roles and clearly screening for their influence level and budget authority in purchasing decisions. Begin by defining the segments: you likely need senior decision-makers (like CIOs or IT directors) who hold budget control, as well as key influencers (such as IT managers, architects, or tech leads) who research and recommend solutions even if they don't sign the check. When sourcing candidates (via LinkedIn, industry panels, or B2B communities), use screeners that ask about their role in the last major IT purchase — did they approve the budget, evaluate vendors, or just provide input? — and the typical size of spend they oversee. By verifying both their job title and their practical influence on buying decisions, you ensure your sample includes true IT buyers and gatekeepers, yielding insights that reflect how B2B tech purchases actually happen.

Question 4

How should we set global templates without stifling local creativity?

Accepted Answer

Design global templates with a flexible framework: establish the core elements that must be consistent worldwide but leave room for local adaptation. For example, define standard metrics, questions, or brand elements that every market's version must include for consistency, while allowing regions to add custom sections, examples, or language nuances to fit their audience. In practice, many organizations use an 80/20 rule--around 80% of the template is standardized for global consistency, while 20% is open for local teams to tailor. Make it clear which parts of the template are mandatory and which are optional or modifiable, and even invite local teams to contribute ideas to the global template guidelines. This approach maintains a common structure for comparability but empowers local creativity, ensuring the template guides quality without becoming a one-size-fits-all straitjacket.

Question 5

How can we design dashboards that serve both executives and analysts?

Accepted Answer

Design dashboards with layered views to satisfy both executives and analysts by offering high-level insights at a glance and easy paths to detailed data when needed. Executives typically want a quick snapshot of key performance indicators (KPIs) and trends, so the dashboard's top level should use clear visuals (like summary charts or big number indicators) to highlight the metrics that matter most to leadership. At the same time, analysts require the ability to drill down into the numbers, filter data, and explore granular details. You can accommodate this by making each headline metric interactive — allowing a click-through to more detailed reports or by providing toggle switches between "overview" and "detailed" modes. For example, an executive might see overall sales this quarter versus last, while an analyst could dive into a specific region's weekly figures from that same dashboard. The key is simplicity on the surface with depth underneath: a clean, uncluttered executive view paired with accessible analytical tools and data behind it, often achieved through user role customization or progressive disclosure of information.

Cathaya Research

Why choose Us

What is Cathaya Research?

Recognition

Research Facility

Research Facility Details

Facility Rooms

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How do I prove ROI from investing in decentralized clinical trials?

When should local qual be used to resolve conflicting global quant signals?

How should we recruit IT buyers by role, influence, and budget control?

How should we set global templates without stifling local creativity?

How can we design dashboards that serve both executives and analysts?