Question 1

How are loyalty programs evolving in response to inflation and digital-first?

Accepted Answer

Loyalty programs are evolving by offering more immediate value and personalized digital experiences to counter inflation and serve a digital-first customer base. With inflation squeezing budgets, many programs have shifted to provide instant rewards — like cash-back credits, fuel discounts, or same-day coupons — rather than making members wait to accumulate points, so customers feel real savings on everyday purchases. At the same time, loyalty has gone fully digital: mobile apps and online portals now deliver personalized offers in real time, and programs use data to tailor rewards (for example, suggesting discounts on items a particular customer buys often). Gamification features such as challenges, tiers, and badges on these apps keep members engaged, while partnerships (e.g., linking a grocery store loyalty program with a gas station) add extra value to help offset rising costs. Overall, flexibility and relevance have increased — members can easily access and use their perks through digital channels, and the rewards are structured to meaningfully help with inflation-driven price concerns.

Question 2

What cultural differences most affect path-to-purchase research across markets?

Accepted Answer

Cultural norms fundamentally shape how consumers move from awareness to purchase, so the biggest factors are differences in decision-making style and social influences. For example, in more collectivist cultures, buying decisions tend to involve family or community input, whereas individualistic cultures prioritize personal research and preferences_x000D_. These variations affect the path-to-purchase: one market may rely heavily on word-of-mouth or family recommendations, while another leans on individual online research and direct brand messaging. Other cultural dimensions play a role too — attitudes toward risk, trust in advertising, or the importance of price vs. brand prestige all vary by country, altering which touchpoints matter most on the purchase journey. Tailoring your path-to-purchase research to these cultural habits ensures you capture what truly drives decisions in each market.

Question 3

How do we prove the impact of CX fixes on churn, cost-to-serve, and revenue?

Accepted Answer

Use controlled experiments to directly link customer experience (CX) improvements to reductions in churn, lower cost-to-serve, and higher revenue. The most convincing proof comes from an A/B test or pilot: one set of customers gets the improved experience while a similar set does not, and you track differences in churn rates, support costs, and spending between the two groups. If running an experiment isn't feasible, a before-and-after analysis with robust controls (like comparing similar customer cohorts or regions) can also isolate the effect of the CX fix. In either case, quantify the impact--for example, show that churn dropped by a certain percentage and service expenses fell while revenue per customer rose following the change. Hard numbers tied to the timing of the fix turn a gut feeling about CX benefits into solid evidence for stakeholders.

Question 4

What's a safe approach for utilities to test dynamic pricing communications?

Accepted Answer

The safest way for a utility to test dynamic pricing communications is through a controlled pilot that prioritizes customer understanding and feedback. Start by rolling out the new rate messaging to a small, opt-in group or in a trial environment - for example, sending "shadow" bills that show time-of-use pricing impacts without actually changing what customers pay. (This way, customers see how their bill could change under dynamic pricing without any risk.) This lets the utility gauge how well customers grasp the information and adjust the wording or delivery as needed before a wider launch. By closely monitoring questions, confusion, and reactions in this test group, you can refine the communication strategy. The result is that when dynamic pricing goes live, the messaging is clear, transparent, and far less likely to prompt customer pushback.

Question 5

How can transformation research better support change fatigue management?

Accepted Answer

Transformation research helps prevent change fatigue by making employee feedback continuous and actionable during a major change. Instead of a one-time survey at the end, run frequent pulse surveys throughout to gauge how people feel — whether they understand the changes, how stressed they are, etc. Break down responses by team or department to find where fatigue or frustration is building. Then act quickly: if one group is overwhelmed by too many new initiatives at once, pause a less critical project for them or add support; if many employees say they don't understand why the change is happening, immediately step up communication about the vision and reasons. In the next pulse, check if those adjustments helped (did stress indicators improve, do more people get the "why"?). The key is to respond in near real time to what you learn. By continually listening and adapting, you catch early warning signs of fatigue and course-correct on the fly. This approach keeps people more engaged and the transformation on track without burning everyone out.

MindFull Quality Research Support

What is MindFull Quality Research Support?

Research Facility

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How are loyalty programs evolving in response to inflation and digital-first?

What cultural differences most affect path-to-purchase research across markets?

How do we prove the impact of CX fixes on churn, cost-to-serve, and revenue?

What's a safe approach for utilities to test dynamic pricing communications?

How can transformation research better support change fatigue management?