Question 1

Do mobile-first surveys distort concept screening results for desktop products?

Accepted Answer

Mobile-first surveys can introduce subtle bias when evaluating concepts for desktop products, so researchers take care to mitigate any distortion. If respondents view a desktop software concept on a small phone screen, they might not grasp the full interface or usage context, possibly underrating the idea. To counter this, concept tests may include responsive design elements — ensuring images and descriptions convey the concept clearly on mobile — or even instruct a subset of participants to take the survey on desktop for comparison. The key is to validate that mobile formatting isn't skewing results: often the findings from mobile-first surveys align with desktop feedback if questions are well-crafted, but doing a cross-check on the intended platform (desktop) confirms the concept's true potential.

Question 2

How can we balance speed gains from automation with quality control?

Accepted Answer

To harness automation's speed without sacrificing quality, organizations set up checkpoints and oversight where a human or a second system verifies the automated results. The idea is to let AI or scripts do the heavy lifting — like processing data or drafting reports — up to a point, then pause for a quality control step. For example, a survey platform might auto-generate a summary of open-ended responses, but a researcher reviews a sample of those summaries to ensure accuracy and tone. Teams also program validation rules or anomaly detectors to catch obvious errors (say, flagging if an automated data entry suddenly spikes beyond expected ranges). By blending rapid automation with these planned quality gates and occasional spot checks, companies can move fast while still confidently maintaining high standards.

Question 3

Does self-serve mean stakeholders won't need research teams anymore?

Accepted Answer

No — self-serve research tools don't spell the end of research teams. They let stakeholders handle straightforward queries, but expert researchers are still needed for robust methodology and deep insights. Platforms for DIY surveys or data dashboards empower non-researchers to get quick answers, but complex projects and nuanced interpretation require a professional touch. Research teams ensure surveys are well-designed (avoiding leading questions or sampling bias) and that results are correctly understood in context, something a drag-and-drop tool can't guarantee on its own. In fact, self-serve tools often shift the researcher's role rather than eliminate it: the team can spend less time on routine data pulls and more time providing guidance, advanced analysis, and strategic recommendations. Stakeholders may initiate more on their own, but they still rely on research experts to validate approaches and synthesize findings into meaningful direction. So self-service makes research more collaborative and efficient, not redundant.

Question 4

How is the shift to private communities affecting social listening?

Accepted Answer

As online conversations shift into private communities, traditional social listening has a harder time capturing those insights. Many consumers now discuss brands or needs in closed groups, messaging apps, or invite-only forums that social listening tools can't access_x000D_. This means that simply monitoring public social media provides a less complete picture today — there's an increasing blind spot. Brands are adapting by recruiting private community members for feedback or leveraging aggregated data (like anonymized trend reports) where possible. Ultimately, the rise of private online spaces is reducing the volume of easily accessible chatter for social listening, pushing researchers to find new ways to hear the customer's voice, such as cultivating owned communities or using qualitative approaches to complement the shrinking public data.

Question 5

What situations call for location-triggered mobile surveys?

Accepted Answer

Location-triggered mobile surveys--those that send a questionnaire to someone's phone when they enter or exit a specific place--are ideal when you need in-the-moment feedback tied to a location. For example, to get feedback on a retail store visit or an event experience, you can geofence the venue and push a survey as soon as someone leaves, while the memory is fresh. The general rule is to deploy these when timing is critical--if you waited even a day, details would fade or responses might be less accurate. Just ensure participants have opted in to location tracking and are likely to notice the survey on their phone at that moment. In the right scenario, a location-triggered prompt yields high-quality, immediate data that would be hard to capture after the fact.

itracks

Why choose Us

Features and attributes

What is itracks?

Reviews

Recognition

Market Research Products

itracks Realtime

itracks Board/ itracks Community (Online & Mobile)

itracks Telephone IDI

Services and Expertise

Published on Greenbook

Using itracks Video Chat to Further Understand Consumer Segments

Unlimited Length Mobile Video Uploads – Are we there yet?

Research Resources

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

Do mobile-first surveys distort concept screening results for desktop products?

How can we balance speed gains from automation with quality control?

Does self-serve mean stakeholders won't need research teams anymore?

How is the shift to private communities affecting social listening?

What situations call for location-triggered mobile surveys?