Question 1

What data-privacy differences matter most for mobile studies across regions?

Accepted Answer

The most critical data-privacy differences for mobile studies across regions involve varying laws and cultural expectations about personal data. For example, Europe's GDPR requires explicit opt-in consent for collecting personal information (like location or device IDs) and grants participants rights to access or delete their data, making robust consent screens and disclosures essential in EU mobile research. In the US, laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) also protect mobile data but focus more on transparency and giving users the ability to opt out rather than upfront consent. Other regions impose their own rulesâ€"some countries mandate that data about their citizens be stored within national borders (data residency laws), affecting where you host mobile research data. Even cultural attitudes toward privacy differ (continuous GPS tracking might be fine in one market but considered intrusive in another). In short, pay attention to each region's consent standards, definitions of sensitive data, and data handling requirements, and tailor your mobile research practices accordingly to remain compliant and trustworthy.

Question 2

Does the path-to-purchase always start with brand awareness?

Accepted Answer

No, the path to purchase doesn't always start with conscious brand awareness; consumers often enter the journey at different points. Many buying journeys begin with a need or problem, not a particular brand: a person realizes they need a solution (say, a safer car seat or a new software tool) and then researches options, encountering brands during that search rather than starting with one in mind. In some cases, the first touchpoint is a recommendation or online review; for example, a friend's suggestion or a top result on Amazon might introduce a product before the shopper has any prior awareness of the brand. With the non-linear, digital-heavy consumer journey today, factors like search engines, social media, and influencers can drop a brand into the consideration phase directly. Brand awareness is helpful, but it's not a universal starting line--often the trigger is need or discovery, so marketers must be present where those triggers happen, not just rely on preexisting awareness.

Question 3

How can we still run effective mobile qual studies with small budgets?

Accepted Answer

Effective mobile qualitative studies are possible even on small budgets by leveraging participants' own smartphones and zeroing in on high-value activities. For example, instead of costly in-person visits, you can ask respondents to use their phones to capture experiences--such as sending short video or photo diaries from their daily routines. Many low-cost research platforms offer mobile diary or chat tools that let a single moderator manage a study remotely with dozens of participants. To maximize insights per dollar, keep tasks concise (reducing participant burden and incentive costs) and recruit a focused sample so you don't overspend on excessive participants. By embracing everyday tech and streamlining the research design, you can gather rich qualitative insights with minimal expense--just a bit of extra creativity and planning upfront.

Question 4

How are self-checkout and cashierless stores changing in-store research?

Accepted Answer

The advent of self-checkout and cashierless stores is changing in-store research by shifting the focus to new touchpoints and data streams. Researchers now pay closer attention to how shoppers navigate the store and interact with technology - for example, observing where customers get confused at a self-checkout kiosk or how long they linger in front of smart shelves. Traditional methods like exit interviews are less feasible (there's no waiting line to intercept in a cashierless store), so more research is done via sensors, video analytics, and post-visit surveys to capture feedback. These stores also generate a wealth of digital behavioral data (entry and exit times, movement paths, what items were picked up then put back) that researchers can analyze for patterns. In short, in-store research is becoming more about unobtrusive tech-driven observation and analyzing system logs, with an emphasis on user experience design (ensuring the self-service process is smooth) and understanding shopping behavior in this new, staff-free environment.

Question 5

Is mobile research mainly useful for younger consumers?

Accepted Answer

Mobile research is valuable well beyond just young consumers, as smartphone use is now common among older demographics too. While it's true that Gen Z and Millennials are heavily mobile-centricâ€"often preferring to answer surveys or diaries on their phonesâ€"research shows that middle-aged and senior consumers increasingly participate via mobile when the design is accessible. In fact, reaching certain groups during their daily routines (like busy parents or on-the-go professionals) may be easiest through mobile apps or texts regardless of age. The key is to tailor the mobile research experience (e.g. using clear large text and simple interfaces) so that even less tech-savvy participants feel comfortable. Mobile has become a mainstream data collection channel, so assuming it's mainly useful for younger people is outdated. Instead, researchers use mobile to capture in-the-moment feedback across age groups, deploying other modes only for those who truly can't or won't use smartphones.

AfriSight

What is AfriSight?

Recognition

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

What data-privacy differences matter most for mobile studies across regions?

Does the path-to-purchase always start with brand awareness?

How can we still run effective mobile qual studies with small budgets?

How are self-checkout and cashierless stores changing in-store research?

Is mobile research mainly useful for younger consumers?