Question 1

How do we increase two-way feedback after town halls or public opinion surveys?

Accepted Answer

Increasing two-way feedback after a town hall or public opinion survey starts with closing the loop — showing people their input was heard and inviting ongoing dialogue. Right after the event or survey, share a summary of the key points raised and any actions the organization will take; this transparency signals that feedback matters. Then provide channels for continued discussion, such as follow-up Q&A sessions, an online community forum, or interactive polls to gather reactions on the changes being made. The process should be iterative: for example, if a policy is adjusted based on public input, report that update back to participants and ask for their thoughts on it. By actively responding and asking for more input, you transform a one-time town hall or survey into an ongoing conversation, which strengthens trust and engagement.

Question 2

When is scenario planning critical to strategic decision-making?

Accepted Answer

Scenario planning becomes critical when a company faces high uncertainty about the future. If your strategic decisions involve long time horizons or volatile factors (like emerging technologies, regulatory changes, or geopolitical shifts), scenario planning is the tool that prepares you for multiple eventualities. Rather than betting on one forecast, teams develop a few plausible scenarios (best-case, worst-case, etc.) and strategize responses for each. This is especially important in situations like entering a new market or during global economic instability — essentially whenever the stakes are high and the path ahead isn't clear. By stress-testing decisions against different scenarios, leaders gain flexibility. In summary, when the environment is uncertain or rapidly changing, scenario planning is critical to ensure your strategic choices are robust under various future conditions.

Question 3

What recruitment safeguards ensure cultural nuance in remote usability studies?

Accepted Answer

To ensure cultural nuance is captured in remote usability studies, put safeguards in your recruitment process that secure truly representative and culturally aware participants. First, use local recruiters or cultural experts who understand the target population to select participants--in other words, recruit native users of the market rather than convenient expats or overly homogenous testers. Make sure language isn't a barrier: participants should be fluent in the test language or, better yet, conduct the sessions in their native language with translation if needed, so they can express subtle feedback. Screen for relevant cultural context too (for example, typical usage habits or values in that culture) to get people who reflect the real user base. It's also wise to recruit a diverse mix within the culture--different regions, ages, subgroups--so you catch variations in behavior or preference. By using culturally sensitive recruiters, proper language support, and careful screening criteria, you'll capture the nuances of each locale in your remote usability research.

Question 4

How can CI better cover startups and emerging disruptors?

Accepted Answer

Competitive Intelligence (CI) teams can better cover startups and emerging disruptors by casting a wider net of sources and using modern analytics to catch early signals that traditional reports might miss. For example, monitoring startup databases (e.g., Crunchbase or PitchBook) and funding news, tracking patent filings and key hires, or even following accelerator demo days and niche tech forums can reveal new players before they become obvious. CI professionals are also using AI-driven tools to scan social media chatter, specialized blogs, and job postings for digital breadcrumbs that hint at a startup's activities and momentum. By expanding into these non-traditional channels and engaging industry networks, CI can spot disruptive entrants sooner and give leadership an early heads-up on potential threats or partnership opportunities before those startups hit the mainstream radar.

Question 5

What elasticity threshold signals we should re-package versus discount?

Accepted Answer

A high price elasticity--meaning demand jumps significantly with small price changes--is usually a signal to repackage rather than discount your product. If lowering the price slightly causes a big spike in volume, it shows consumers are very price-sensitive. In that case, instead of giving steep discounts (which can erode your brand's value and margins), it might be smarter to introduce a smaller pack or budget version at a lower price point. This way you cater to price-sensitive customers without slashing the unit price of your main offering. On the other hand, if elasticity is low (demand hardly changes when you adjust price), then discounting won't boost sales much and just eats into margin--better to hold your price and perhaps add value in other ways instead of cutting price. In summary, when demand is extremely price-sensitive (high elasticity), create a more affordable package or size to hit a lower price, whereas with low elasticity there's little gain from discounting at all.

P+ Solution (Pesquise Mais)

What is P+ Solution (Pesquise Mais)?

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How do we increase two-way feedback after town halls or public opinion surveys?

When is scenario planning critical to strategic decision-making?

What recruitment safeguards ensure cultural nuance in remote usability studies?

How can CI better cover startups and emerging disruptors?

What elasticity threshold signals we should re-package versus discount?