Question 1

What privacy risks are salient when recording in private spaces?

Accepted Answer

Recording research sessions in private spaces (like participants' homes) raises significant privacy risks, from accidentally capturing sensitive personal details to requiring strict data protection measures. One issue is that a recording may inadvertently include other people who haven't consented (family members or roommates) or reveal private information in the background (documents, photos, conversations). Participants themselves might not realize how much of their private life is being captured, so clear communication and consent about what will be recorded is crucial. Data security is another major concern: footage from inside someone's home is highly sensitive, so it must be stored and transmitted securely (using encryption, restricted access) to prevent any leaks or breaches. Compliance with privacy laws and ethical guidelines (like obtaining IRB-approved consent) is essential — consent forms should outline exactly how the recording will be used and when it will be destroyed. Ultimately, researchers must mitigate these privacy risks by getting explicit, informed consent, possibly anonymizing or blurring identifying details in the recordings, and rigorously safeguarding the data at every step.

Question 2

What safeguards handle right-to-left scripts and accessibility needs?

Accepted Answer

To accommodate right-to-left (RTL) scripts and ensure accessibility, you need both technical and design safeguards in place. First, any interface or survey should support bidirectional text rendering - meaning it can correctly display languages like Arabic or Hebrew (with text alignment and layout mirroring as needed) without breaking the design. This often involves using Unicode-compliant fonts and testing that UI elements flip appropriately (for example, navigation arrows or progress bars should reverse direction in RTL mode). On the accessibility side, follow standards like WCAG: ensure screen reader compatibility by providing proper HTML structure and alternative text for images, and use high-contrast color schemes and scalable fonts for those with visual impairments. It's also important to allow keyboard-only navigation and consider captions or transcripts for audio/video content. In practice, "safeguards" mean building the product to be flexible - detecting when an RTL language is used and automatically adjusting the layout - and routinely testing with assistive technologies to catch any usability issues before launch.

Question 3

What situations call for location-triggered mobile surveys?

Accepted Answer

Location-triggered mobile surveys--those that send a questionnaire to someone's phone when they enter or exit a specific place--are ideal when you need in-the-moment feedback tied to a location. For example, to get feedback on a retail store visit or an event experience, you can geofence the venue and push a survey as soon as someone leaves, while the memory is fresh. The general rule is to deploy these when timing is critical--if you waited even a day, details would fade or responses might be less accurate. Just ensure participants have opted in to location tracking and are likely to notice the survey on their phone at that moment. In the right scenario, a location-triggered prompt yields high-quality, immediate data that would be hard to capture after the fact.

Question 4

How do I compare ROI from mobile ethnography with classic in-person methods?

Accepted Answer

To compare the return on investment (ROI) of mobile ethnography versus classic in-person ethnography, evaluate both the costs and the type of insights each yields for the same research goals. Mobile ethnography (participants using smartphone apps to record diaries, photos, or videos) generally has lower fieldwork costs and scales more easily - you can engage many participants at once across locations without travel expenses. Traditional in-person ethnography requires a researcher on-site with each participant, which is expensive and time-intensive but can produce very deep, contextual insights that might be missed remotely. In assessing ROI, consider metrics like cost per insight or actionable finding: a mobile study might deliver a higher volume of observations per dollar, while an in-person study might provide more profound revelations per participant. Also factor in speed (mobile studies often finish faster) and overall impact (did one method uncover key insights that the other didn't?). By weighing total spend against the relevance and depth of insights gained, you can judge which approach gave better ROI for your needs.

Question 5

Is mobile research mainly useful for younger consumers?

Accepted Answer

Mobile research is valuable well beyond just young consumers, as smartphone use is now common among older demographics too. While it's true that Gen Z and Millennials are heavily mobile-centric — often preferring to answer surveys or diaries on their phones — research shows that middle-aged and senior consumers increasingly participate via mobile when the design is accessible. In fact, reaching certain groups during their daily routines (like busy parents or on-the-go professionals) may be easiest through mobile apps or texts regardless of age. The key is to tailor the mobile research experience (e.g. using clear large text and simple interfaces) so that even less tech-savvy participants feel comfortable. Mobile has become a mainstream data collection channel, so assuming it's mainly useful for younger people is outdated. Instead, researchers use mobile to capture in-the-moment feedback across age groups, deploying other modes only for those who truly can't or won't use smartphones.

Sample Answers Limited

Why choose Us

What is Sample Answers Limited?

Sample Answers Limited Services and Expertise