Research Methodologies

February 9, 2016

Bias in Primary Elections and its Applicability in New Product Research

Bias in Primary Elections and its Applicability in New Product Research

Could there be situations in which some purposely predisposed informational bias is beneficial?

So I certainly do not follow politics closely, even during a presidential election year, which I guess could also be read as I don’t know very much about politics. But that small disclaimer aside, watching the news coverage of the recently passed Iowa Caucuses and upcoming New Hampshire primary, something struck me as peculiar in this process. These events happen in succession, not simultaneously. So first is the Iowa Caucus, then the New Hampshire primary, followed by the Nevada and South Carolina primaries, and so on with the other states.  And after each event is held the results are (almost) immediately known. So the folks in New Hampshire know the outcome from Iowa. The folks in Nevada and South Carolina know the outcomes from Iowa and New Hampshire.

Doesn’t this lead to inherent and obvious bias? That’s the market researcher side talking. In implementing questionnaires we wouldn’t typically make known the results from previous respondents to those taking the survey later. This would surely have some influence on their answers that we wouldn’t want. We need a clean, pure read (as best as we can with surveys) as to consumer opinions and attitudes. Any deviation from this would surely compromise our data.

But then again, is this always the case? Could there be situations in which some purposely predisposed informational bias is beneficial? I say yes! Granted one needs to be cautious and thoughtful when exposing respondents to prior information, but sometimes in order to get the specific type of response we want, a little bias is helpful. If asking about a particular product or product function, we may provide an example or guide so they can fully understand the product. E.g. 10 GB of storage is good for X number of movies and X number of songs.

But circling back to the notion of letting respondents see the answers from previous respondents, even within the same survey, this could be quite helpful in priming folks to start thinking creatively. If we wish to gather creative ideas from consumers, it’s easy enough to ask them outright to jot something down. But it’s difficult to come up with new and creative ideas on the fly without much help. And responses we get from such tasks validate that point as many are nonsense, or short dull answers. So instead, we could show a respondent several ideas that have come up previously, either internally or from previous respondents, to jumpstart the thinking process and either edit/add onto an existing idea, or be stimulated enough to come up with their own unique idea. And truth is, it works! We at TRC implement this exact new product research technique with great success in our Idea Mill™ solution, and end up with many creative and unique ideas that our client companies use to move forward.

So while the presidential process strikes me as odd since any votes cast in other states following the Iowa Caucus may be inherently biased, there are opportunities where this sort of predisposition to information can work in our favor.

 

Photo by Jonathan Simcoe on Unsplash

electionspollingrespondent

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Westley Ritz

Westley Ritz

1 article

author bio

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

ARTICLES

When Easy Becomes Empty: The Frictionless Feedback Fallacy
Research Methodologies

When Easy Becomes Empty: The Frictionless Feedback Fallacy

Making surveys easier doesn’t always improve insights. Discover why thoughtful feedback design balances convenience with meaningful, reflective respon...

Tarik Covington

Tarik Covington

Founder & Chief Strategist at Covariate. Human-Centered Insights

The Always-on Agency: How to Survive the Shift to Intelligence-Native Organizations
Research Methodologies

The Always-on Agency: How to Survive the Shift to Intelligence-Native Organizations

The insight agency model is under pressure. In an always-on world, success depends on becoming a decision partner, not just a supplier of research pro...

Hannah Mann

Hannah Mann

Founding Partner at Day One Strategy

The Ambiguity of Frequent Survey Participation: Is “Hyperactivity” a Signal of Professional Fraud?
Research Methodologies

The Ambiguity of Frequent Survey Participation: Is “Hyperactivity” a Signal of Professional Fraud?

Learn how to identify engaged respondents, detect bad actors, and improve data quality for more reliable research outcomes.

Sebastian Berger

Sebastian Berger

Head of Science ReDem at Rep Data

Ethical by Design: The Questions Every Mixed-Method Research Team Should Be Asking
Research Methodologies

Ethical by Design: The Questions Every Mixed-Method Research Team Should Be Asking

Explore the ethical questions researchers should ask when combining surveys, interviews, AI analysis, synthetic data, and behavioral tracking in mixed...

Ashley Shedlock

Ashley Shedlock

Content Producer at Greenbook

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers