Research Methodologies

February 21, 2011

Can We Stop Arguing Over What’s The “Best” Methodology?

There is no “best” methodology or approach. The “best” methodology is the one that will be most ideal for the specific project at hand.

By Ron Sellers

Blogs and message boards are a great way to discuss research questions.  Some discussions I’ve seen recently:

  • Is it better to do one long survey or multiple shorter surveys?
  • Is qualitative research or quantitative research more likely to result in usable insights?
  • Should researchers be using CATI interviews or online panels?
  • Are focus groups superior to IDIs, or do IDIs provide greater insights?
  • Are traditional focus groups better than online qualitative, or is it the other way around?
  • Are online panels better than social media sampling, or vice versa?

The fascinating thing is that in every case, the posed question is then followed by multiple answers and discussion of which option is right.  People passionately defend their selection and denigrate the other choice.  I’ve even seen some nasty comments and arguments arise from these debates.

The funny thing is that to have a blanket debate like this on these topics is largely pointless.  There simply is no overall answer to whether qualitative projects should be online or face-to-face.  There is no way to answer whether qualitative or quantitative work generates greater insight.  That’s like arguing whether every American would be better off driving a minivan, a family sedan, or a pickup truck.  If you want to haul lumber and tow your boat, you drive a pickup.  If you want to take your six kids to the soccer game, you drive a minivan.

To put it bluntly, saying a minivan is simply a better vehicle than a family sedan is, well, rather dumb.  So is saying IDIs are simply better than focus groups (or the other way ‘round).

As researchers, part of our responsibility is to know the best way of getting the insights we seek, taking into consideration the target audience, the geography, the budget, the timeline, the topic, and the information objectives.  There are times when telephone research is the best option.  There are other times when the project is much more appropriate for an online approach.  And guess what – there are even times when mail surveys or intercept interviews are the preferable way to go.

So can we stop arguing over what’s the “best” methodology?  There is no “best” methodology or approach, other than the fact the “best” methodology is the one that will be most ideal for the specific project at hand.

Unless you really think that everyone in the world should drive a minivan.

online researchqualitative researchquantitative research

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Ron Sellers

Ron Sellers

63 articles

author bio

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

More from Ron Sellers

Are the Fraudsters More Sophisticated Than the Researchers?
Research Methodologies

Are the Fraudsters More Sophisticated Than the Researchers?

It’s amazing what some people will do in order to make a buck-fifty. Two recent studies have brought to light how sophisticated panel fraud has become...

Still More Dirty Little Secrets of Online Panels
Research Methodologies

Still More Dirty Little Secrets of Online Panels

Nearly half of your panel data is trash. Here is how to fix it.

Can Political Polls Really Be Trusted?

Can Political Polls Really Be Trusted?

When political polls fail to predict the exact outcome of an election, maybe they’re not wrong…maybe we are.

Panel Quality Stinks and Clients Are To Blame
Research Methodologies

Panel Quality Stinks and Clients Are To Blame

Why should panel companies improve their results when clients accept the status quo and won’t pay for better?

ARTICLES

The Insights Industry Has a Decision Problem — And It’s Costing Companies Millions
Research Methodologies

Partner Content

The Insights Industry Has a Decision Problem — And It’s Costing Companies Millions

Companies don’t lack insights, they lack activation. Discover why valuable research goes unused and how real-time intelligence drives better decisions...

Evan Williams

Evan Williams

Executive Strategy Consultant at Stravito AB

From Panel to People: Practical Strategies for Building Inclusive and Bias-Free Research in 2026
Research Methodologies

From Panel to People: Practical Strategies for Building Inclusive and Bias-Free Research in 2026

In 2026, research teams move beyond AI adoption. Learn how to build inclusive panels, reduce bias, and deliver more credible, representative insights.

Ryan Walton

Ryan Walton

Entrepreneur at Ryan Walton

How to Improve Collaboration Between Market Research and Product Teams
Research Methodologies

How to Improve Collaboration Between Market Research and Product Teams

Boost product success by aligning research and product teams—test assumptions with real user behavior to plan releases with greater confidence.

Tasbhih Amin

Tasbhih Amin

Marketing Manager at Cirface

The Illusion of Voice: Why Participation Is Not Understanding
Research Methodologies

The Illusion of Voice: Why Participation Is Not Understanding

Feedback systems shape experience. Learn how survey design and dashboards limit what’s sayable—and why participation alone doesn’t ensure real insight...

Tarik Covington

Tarik Covington

Founder & Chief Strategist at Covariate. Human-Centered Insights

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers