Research Methodologies

February 21, 2011

Can We Stop Arguing Over What’s The “Best” Methodology?

There is no “best” methodology or approach. The “best” methodology is the one that will be most ideal for the specific project at hand.

By Ron Sellers

Blogs and message boards are a great way to discuss research questions.  Some discussions I’ve seen recently:

  • Is it better to do one long survey or multiple shorter surveys?
  • Is qualitative research or quantitative research more likely to result in usable insights?
  • Should researchers be using CATI interviews or online panels?
  • Are focus groups superior to IDIs, or do IDIs provide greater insights?
  • Are traditional focus groups better than online qualitative, or is it the other way around?
  • Are online panels better than social media sampling, or vice versa?

The fascinating thing is that in every case, the posed question is then followed by multiple answers and discussion of which option is right.  People passionately defend their selection and denigrate the other choice.  I’ve even seen some nasty comments and arguments arise from these debates.

The funny thing is that to have a blanket debate like this on these topics is largely pointless.  There simply is no overall answer to whether qualitative projects should be online or face-to-face.  There is no way to answer whether qualitative or quantitative work generates greater insight.  That’s like arguing whether every American would be better off driving a minivan, a family sedan, or a pickup truck.  If you want to haul lumber and tow your boat, you drive a pickup.  If you want to take your six kids to the soccer game, you drive a minivan.

To put it bluntly, saying a minivan is simply a better vehicle than a family sedan is, well, rather dumb.  So is saying IDIs are simply better than focus groups (or the other way ‘round).

As researchers, part of our responsibility is to know the best way of getting the insights we seek, taking into consideration the target audience, the geography, the budget, the timeline, the topic, and the information objectives.  There are times when telephone research is the best option.  There are other times when the project is much more appropriate for an online approach.  And guess what – there are even times when mail surveys or intercept interviews are the preferable way to go.

So can we stop arguing over what’s the “best” methodology?  There is no “best” methodology or approach, other than the fact the “best” methodology is the one that will be most ideal for the specific project at hand.

Unless you really think that everyone in the world should drive a minivan.

online researchqualitative researchquantitative research

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Ron Sellers

Ron Sellers

63 articles

author bio

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

More from Ron Sellers

Are the Fraudsters More Sophisticated Than the Researchers?
Research Methodologies

Are the Fraudsters More Sophisticated Than the Researchers?

It’s amazing what some people will do in order to make a buck-fifty. Two recent studies have brought to light how sophisticated panel fraud has become...

Still More Dirty Little Secrets of Online Panels
Research Methodologies

Still More Dirty Little Secrets of Online Panels

Nearly half of your panel data is trash. Here is how to fix it.

Can Political Polls Really Be Trusted?

Can Political Polls Really Be Trusted?

When political polls fail to predict the exact outcome of an election, maybe they’re not wrong…maybe we are.

Panel Quality Stinks and Clients Are To Blame
Research Methodologies

Panel Quality Stinks and Clients Are To Blame

Why should panel companies improve their results when clients accept the status quo and won’t pay for better?

ARTICLES

What To Expect In 2026
Research Methodologies

What To Expect In 2026

What will insights look like in 2026? Ester Marchetti examines real-time insight, dynamic personas, ethical AI, and expanding influence.

Ester Marchetti

Ester Marchetti

Co-Founder & Chief Innovation Officer at Bolt Insight

When Listening Turns Into Noise: The Real Reason People Ignore Surveys
Research Methodologies

When Listening Turns Into Noise: The Real Reason People Ignore Surveys

Asking more can backfire. Discover how feedback overload erodes trust and data quality and what drives meaningful engagement.

Tarik Covington

Tarik Covington

Founder & Chief Strategist at Covariate. Human-Centered Insights

The Five Eras of Online Sampling: An Industry Perspective
Research Methodologies

Partner Content

The Five Eras of Online Sampling: An Industry Perspective

A 20-year industry veteran reflects on the key eras that reshaped market research, from shifting strategies to evolving KPIs.

Michael McCrary

Michael McCrary

CEO at PureSpectrum

Building Community, Shaping Insight, and Finding Relevance: A Conversation with Diane Hessan
Executive Insights

Building Community, Shaping Insight, and Finding Relevance: A Conversation with Diane Hessan

A candid Q&A with Diane Hessan explores her career, industry disruption, and timeless lessons for the future of insights.

Ed Keller

Ed Keller

Executive Director at Market Research Institute International (MRII)

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers