Moving Away from a Narcissistic Market Research Model

Moving Away from a Narcissistic Market Research Model

Why are we still measuring brand loyalty? It isn’t something that naturally comes up with consumers, who rarely think about brand first, if at all. Market research and marketing nomenclature…

Why are we still measuring brand loyalty? It isn’t something that naturally comes up with consumers, who rarely think about brand first, if at all. Market research and marketing nomenclature has long centered around brand awareness, consideration and NPS, but customers don’t think along these lines. There’s a big disconnect here that is negatively affecting consumer understanding, and successful business decision making.

It’s well past time to shift the conversation. It’s a hard move. Brands want to know about themselves, but the consumer doesn’t care about the brand – they care about their own needs. We’ve talked about this approach to market research as Brand Narcissism, something we cover in our book and describe like “being on a date with someone who is wracked with insecurities” who is asking questions like “Why did you first decide to go out with me?”, “How would you describe me to your friends?” or “How do I compare to the other people you know about?”

Related

Neuroscience in Market Research: Beyond the Hype

While marketers probably do have these types of questions, related to their brand, that is not the way a consumer thinks when they are making a purchase decision. Researchers can easily corrupt their insights by continuing to pursue these navel-gazing questions. The purchase funnel we’ve relied on for so long, bears little resemblance to the way consumers are behaving and thinking about shopping in today’s world.

While the consumer landscape has been changing for decades, brought on by technology, category disruption, socioeconomics and more, the evolution of the past three years is impossible to ignore. Digital behaviors of all kinds were accelerated, and the way we shop and consume was permanently altered by the pandemic. One of the most prominent changes was a move toward what we call “Shopper Promiscuity”, or the willingness to try new brands, new products, and new categories. In this new state of mind, shoppers prefer to explore and try new things. Nothing loyal about that.

For brands, this means that they are now operating in an era of constant acquisition. While our research shows that susceptibility to the whims of promiscuous shoppers varies by category, the forces – such as innovation, unlimited access to information, the need for personal expression and reprioritization – that are driving the behavior are universal.

“Every customer must be courted and wooed away from competitors, even if they have bought a brand many times before.”

At a basic level, this reality means we need to revisit how we ask questions in our research is vital to collecting good insights. We won’t find out anything new that drives good business strategy by asking the same questions or by using the same approaches that we always have. There are a few things you can do to overcome these hurdles, including utilizing multimodal research techniques and newer methodologies, like neuroscience, that can help answer tough questions in new ways. For example, if you need complex answers for a study, you could include both quantitative stated data and neuroscience or qualitative interviews. New technologies allow us to do this more efficiently and cost-effectively than ever before.

There are many other things you can do to rethink research. We suggest shaking up the way you approach brand trackers, evaluate audience understanding, bring together data streams and much more. First and foremost, put Brand Narcissism in the rearview mirror. It is a barrier to smarter thinking about shoppers and risks delivering outdated metrics. Brands that think like their shoppers do, and don’t take them for granted, are the ones who stand the best chance of being successful.

consumer behaviorneurosciencequantitative research

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Devora Rogers

Devora Rogers

Chief Strategy Officer at Alter Agents

2 articles

author bio

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

More from Devora Rogers

Complex Brand Questions Require Multi-Modal Market Research Approaches
Research Methodologies

Complex Brand Questions Require Multi-Modal Market Research Approaches

How Activision Blizzard used a neuroscience-based multi-modal approach to create a 360-degree picture of the evolving mindset of the esports audience ...

ARTICLES

When Easy Becomes Empty: The Frictionless Feedback Fallacy
Research Methodologies

When Easy Becomes Empty: The Frictionless Feedback Fallacy

Making surveys easier doesn’t always improve insights. Discover why thoughtful feedback design balances convenience with meaningful, reflective respon...

Tarik Covington

Tarik Covington

Founder & Chief Strategist at Covariate. Human-Centered Insights

The Always-on Agency: How to Survive the Shift to Intelligence-Native Organizations
Research Methodologies

The Always-on Agency: How to Survive the Shift to Intelligence-Native Organizations

The insight agency model is under pressure. In an always-on world, success depends on becoming a decision partner, not just a supplier of research pro...

Hannah Mann

Hannah Mann

Founding Partner at Day One Strategy

The Ambiguity of Frequent Survey Participation: Is “Hyperactivity” a Signal of Professional Fraud?
Research Methodologies

The Ambiguity of Frequent Survey Participation: Is “Hyperactivity” a Signal of Professional Fraud?

Learn how to identify engaged respondents, detect bad actors, and improve data quality for more reliable research outcomes.

Sebastian Berger

Sebastian Berger

Head of Science ReDem at Rep Data

Ethical by Design: The Questions Every Mixed-Method Research Team Should Be Asking
Research Methodologies

Ethical by Design: The Questions Every Mixed-Method Research Team Should Be Asking

Explore the ethical questions researchers should ask when combining surveys, interviews, AI analysis, synthetic data, and behavioral tracking in mixed...

Ashley Shedlock

Ashley Shedlock

Content Producer at Greenbook

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers