Question 1

Do heatmaps or eye-tracking add value beyond clickstream analytics?

Accepted Answer

Yes, heatmaps and eye-tracking add extra value beyond what clickstream analytics alone can tell you. Clickstream data shows where users click or the path they take, but it doesn't reveal what they looked at and considered (or struggled with) before clicking. Eye-tracking studies, for example, can show that users' attention is drawn to a particular banner or section even if they never clicked it_x000D_. Similarly, mouse movement or scroll heatmaps can indicate parts of a webpage that are ignored or that confuse users (like if many hover but don't click, implying they expected interactivity). This insight helps improve design: you might discover a call-to-action is missed because it's not where eyes go. In short, these tools uncover the "why" behind user behavior — visual attention and engagement — complementing the "what" that click data provides.

Question 2

How can we improve reproducibility across AI model versions and prompts?

Accepted Answer

Achieving consistent results across Artificial Intelligence (AI) model versions and prompt changes requires standardized processes and careful tracking. Teams should apply strict version control for models and maintain a set of test prompts to compare outputs before and after any model update. For example, running a benchmark suite of queries on the old versus new model version side by side highlights differences that need attention. It's also helpful to lock down settings that affect randomness (for instance, use fixed random seeds) and to craft prompts in a consistent format to reduce variability. Finally, documenting how each model version was trained or tuned provides context if outputs change unexpectedly. By combining these practices, organizations can improve reproducibility and trust in AI outputs over time.

Question 3

How is social commerce reshaping shopper research priorities?

Accepted Answer

The explosion of social commerce is reshaping shopper research priorities by putting much more focus on how social media content, influencers, and peer interactions drive purchase decisions, rather than just the traditional retail or e-commerce journey. For example, research teams are now examining how consumers discover and buy products directly through platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or Pinterest - studying the impact of influencer endorsements, shoppable posts, and user-generated reviews on conversion rates. Instead of just analyzing shelf placement or website UX, researchers are prioritizing questions like: what social content triggers impulse buys, how do comments and likes (social proof) build trust, and where in a scrolling feed a casual user decides to click "buy." New methodologies like social listening and influencer campaign analysis have become important tools, as organizations seek to understand the fast-evolving path to purchase that often starts and ends within social networks. In short, shopper research now extends into social feeds and communities, recognizing that the context and conversations on those platforms are central to modern buying behavior.

Question 4

How can I quantify ROI from cross-channel attribution research?

Accepted Answer

Treat your attribution research as an investment and measure what it changed. Start by identifying the optimizations or shifts in strategy that came out of the cross-channel attribution findings - for example, reallocating budget from one channel to another or cutting spend in low-ROI placements. Then track the results of those changes in hard numbers. If moving spend from Channel A to Channel B increased sales or lowered customer acquisition cost, quantify that impact in dollars. Compare those gains (or savings) to the cost of doing the attribution study. For instance, if the research cost $100K but led to adjustments that generated an extra $500K in revenue or saved $200K in wasted spend, you can confidently report a strong return on investment (in this case 5x revenue gain or net $400K benefit). In short, link the attribution insights to actual performance improvements and calculate the difference - that difference is the ROI attributable to the research.

Question 5

What role do mobile apps now play in shaping in-store decisions?

Accepted Answer

Mobile apps have essentially become personal shopping assistants that influence decisions right in the store aisle. Shoppers frequently use retailer or brand apps while they shop — to get digital coupons, scan QR codes or barcodes for more product info, and even read reviews on the spot. By providing real-time information (like ingredients or price comparisons) and personalized offers, these apps can sway what goes into the cart. Location-aware features play a role too: for instance, an app might send you a push notification about a sale on coffee when you're near the coffee aisle, directly shaping your purchase consideration. Loyalty and payment apps also streamline the experience (think of how Starbucks' app influences in-store orders with rewards and easy pay, or grocery apps enable scan-and-go). In short, mobile apps bridge online and offline shopping by giving consumers on-demand guidance and incentives in store, which means they now heavily shape in-store decision-making and have become a key focus in shopper research.

RIWI

Why choose Us

Features and attributes

What is RIWI?

Research Software and Platform Details

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

Do heatmaps or eye-tracking add value beyond clickstream analytics?

How can we improve reproducibility across AI model versions and prompts?

How is social commerce reshaping shopper research priorities?

How can I quantify ROI from cross-channel attribution research?

What role do mobile apps now play in shaping in-store decisions?