Categories
Full-service research is evolving—tech-driven, modular, and client-centric. Discover why it’s now the dominant strategy in today’s insights landscape.
Last year, GRIT showed us that full-service research was rising. This year, it’s solidified its position as the dominant model – now making up 54% of all supplier-side professionals.
Why? Because the market still wants the same things: fewer vendors, faster turnaround, and integrated support. But what’s changed is how full-service providers are delivering it.
This year’s GRIT report shows a clear link between firm size and tech adoption. The largest providers now allocate nearly one-third of their services to technology – specifically automation, analytics, online data collection, and DIY tools. This investment in technology is giving rise to the role of unstructured data, both in analysis and collection.
What we’re seeing is a new kind of full-service firm: modular, tech-driven, and sharply focused. Rather than doing everything for everyone, the most successful teams are carving out clear, distinctive positions – whether that’s with AI-powered dashboards, niche industry expertise, or hybrid qual-quant methodologies.
Interestingly, even the rise of self-service has benefited full-service providers. By offering lightweight, DIY tools alongside consulting and delivery, these firms are staying close to clients between big projects – helping them stay useful, visible, and indispensable.
The big takeaway? Full-service is no longer just a category – it’s a strategy. It’s about combining tools, talent, and technology into tailored workflows that match how clients actually work. Last year we saw this model rising. This year, we’re seeing it mature.
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Matilda Sarah
GRIT data reveals a governance gap: the teams driving AI adoption in insights are often the least confident in how AI risks are being managed.
The 2025 GRIT Report shows true innovation isn’t just about AI—it’s about reducing friction between data and decisions through clarity and collaborati...
Businesses seek comprehensive insights quickly, driving demand for full-service research suppliers who can efficiently handle all data needs in one so...
The roles of corporate researchers and external suppliers continue to evolve in the wake of the pandemic, especially regarding DIY tools, analytics, a...
ARTICLES
Top in GRIT
The GRIT Report reveals a tension in research: teams want faster, cheaper methods, yet still rely on deep human insight to avoid losing quality.
Qualitative research remains a craft of deliberate choices. As analytics teams expand methods for scale, researchers continue to prioritize depth, con...
AI will compress research workflows, but like Jevons’ paradox, efficiency may expand research activity everywhere—not reduce the need for insights.
The GRIT 2026 data shows quality infrastructure still matters most, with trusted panels and fraud detection remaining essential in AI-driven research.
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.