Introducing System 3: How We Use Our Imagination to Make Choices

Introducing System 3: How We Use Our Imagination to Make Choices

Consumer decision-making is powered by imagination

In recent years we’ve become used to thinking about decisions as “system 1” or “system 2”. System 1 choices are automatic decisions, made without thinking, based on an immediate emotional or sensory reaction. System 2 is used to stop and rationally calculate the consequences of our choices, and determine the best cost-benefit tradeoff.

But these two processes don’t capture every decision. Indeed they might only encompass a minority of our daily choices.

Recent work in neuroscience and psychology has discovered another way of making choices: with the imagination. Customers imagine their possible futures: the outcomes they would experience after a choice, and how those outcomes will make them feel. The future that makes them feel happiest will be the one they choose. These choices use different parts of the brain than System 1 and 2. They are called System 3 choices.

Think about how you might buy a car. System 1 would suggest that you see a colour, or shape, or brand of car, immediately fall in love with it and buy without thinking. System 2 implies that you calculate the price, financing options, fuel efficiency, resale value – and pick the model that makes the most financial sense.

A System 3 decision would look like this: imagine yourself driving that car. Feel, in your mind, the sensations of the seats and how it drives. Imagine how your partner or your friends would view you in it. Consider, too, the impact on your bank account and what else you would be missing out on to pay for it. How you’d feel about the environmental impact and the safety this model offers your family. How do you feel? Is it good? Maybe you also have another model in mind. Try the same process on that. Does it feel better? The car you feel best in – within this mental simulation – is probably the one you’ll choose.

This System 3 process applies to our big choices in life, but also to smaller ones. At the shelf, considering a new breakfast cereal or a new skincare product, you’ll imagine how it tastes or feels before buying it. You might test out the moisturiser from a sample jar, but you still need to project yourself into the future – will it feel the same when you’re applying it before bed, or after you wake up? Your System 3 imagination combines past and present experiences with possible futures, and works out which it enjoys most.

System 1 still has a place: once you are familiar with a product, you might buy it automatically. And we still use system 2 for lots of financial and practical calculations. Indeed, System 3 incorporates elements of systems 1 and 2 in how it works.

But if you’re:

  • Launching something new
  • Trying out a new communications or pack approach
  • Building a brand
  • Or selling something with consequences beyond just the few moments after purchase

Then your customers are probably using System 3 to make their decisions, and you need to use System 3 tools to predict the success of what you’re testing.

Some existing research tools can be used to measure System 3, and new ones are emerging too. Implicit Prospection Tools, newly designed qualitative projection techniques, and Adaptive Concept Tests are among them.

You can find out more about System 3 in my talk at IIeX Behaviour London on 10th May, or by searching for “prospection psychology”. It’s likely to be a hot topic in the coming years (use your System 3 to imagine that possible future!) – and you can get ahead of the curve if you learn about it today.

behavioral scienceconsumer research

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Leigh Caldwell

Leigh Caldwell

Co-Founder & Partner at The Irrational Agency

10 articles

author bio

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

More from Leigh Caldwell

Behavioral Science and UX and CX Research
Behavioral Science

Behavioral Science and UX and CX Research

Discover the value of behavioral science in answering questions and understanding consumer behavior. Bridge the gap between reported and actual behavi...

Behavioral Science and Conjoint and Price Testing (Part 5 of 6)
Behavioral Science

Behavioral Science and Conjoint and Price Testing (Part 5 of 6)

Discover hidden the potential of behavioral science beyond answering complex questions and unraveling the influence of sustainability on purchasing ch...

Behavioral Science and Brand Tracking (Part 4 of 6)
Behavioral Science

Behavioral Science and Brand Tracking (Part 4 of 6)

Explore the role of behavioral science in defining value and uncovering insights about people's thoughts and feelings towards our brand.

Behavioral Science and Concept Testing (Part 3 of 6)
Behavioral Science

Behavioral Science and Concept Testing (Part 3 of 6)

Explore the multifaceted world of behavioral science, from defining value to unraveling the influence of sustainability on our decision-making process...

ARTICLES

When Easy Becomes Empty: The Frictionless Feedback Fallacy
Research Methodologies

When Easy Becomes Empty: The Frictionless Feedback Fallacy

Making surveys easier doesn’t always improve insights. Discover why thoughtful feedback design balances convenience with meaningful, reflective respon...

Tarik Covington

Tarik Covington

Founder & Chief Strategist at Covariate. Human-Centered Insights

The Always-on Agency: How to Survive the Shift to Intelligence-Native Organizations
Research Methodologies

The Always-on Agency: How to Survive the Shift to Intelligence-Native Organizations

The insight agency model is under pressure. In an always-on world, success depends on becoming a decision partner, not just a supplier of research pro...

Hannah Mann

Hannah Mann

Founding Partner at Day One Strategy

The Ambiguity of Frequent Survey Participation: Is “Hyperactivity” a Signal of Professional Fraud?
Research Methodologies

The Ambiguity of Frequent Survey Participation: Is “Hyperactivity” a Signal of Professional Fraud?

Learn how to identify engaged respondents, detect bad actors, and improve data quality for more reliable research outcomes.

Sebastian Berger

Sebastian Berger

Head of Science ReDem at Rep Data

Ethical by Design: The Questions Every Mixed-Method Research Team Should Be Asking
Research Methodologies

Ethical by Design: The Questions Every Mixed-Method Research Team Should Be Asking

Explore the ethical questions researchers should ask when combining surveys, interviews, AI analysis, synthetic data, and behavioral tracking in mixed...

Ashley Shedlock

Ashley Shedlock

Content Producer at Greenbook

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers