Research Methodologies

October 28, 2015

The Modern Research Respondent: Holding Their Attention with Dynamic Questions

Dynamic questions can improve the survey experience. Here are some common sense ways to avoid pitfalls when using dynamic questions.

Man with megaphone and white board

 

By Aaron Jue

It’s a constant struggle in the world of market research – keeping an increasingly demanding respondent engaged. With attention spans at an all-time low, and technology innovations across the board, people expect and feel entitled to a certain level of interactivity while online. This includes the interface that they encounter when responding to market research outreach.

While there are many points that must be addressed to significantly increase engagement, we recently studied the specific impact of dynamic questions. These questions are more compelling and interactive, providing a graphical and interactive way for researchers to capture respondent data in online surveys. Standard HTML inputs, such as traditional radio buttons or select boxes, may not be the most user friendly or engaging forms for today’s research respondent. Using Javascript or HTML5, dynamic questions enable more flexible and customized design elements to hold respondent attention and address the need for greater responsivity.

Dynamic element examples include:

  • Drag and drop
  • Sliders
  • Card sort
  • Rank sort
  • Button select

The enhanced and flexible design capabilities of dynamic questions allows researchers to create question types that are suitable for different platforms. Traditional radio button designs may be too small for mobile device screens. We can use dynamic question to create larger, mobile friendly forms, such as ATM style boxes.  Visual cues– like the illusion of a depressed button when it is selected–also enhance usability and help increase survey participation among the mobile population.

Instead of a pick list using checkbox forms, the survey researcher may employ a shelf test to better simulate a real-world shopping experience. Using a drag and drop interface, respondents can physically rank order a set of cards rather than typing in a rank number in a text box. In both of these instances the dynamic forms establish an intuitive and user-friendly way for survey respondents to express their opinions about a brand or product.

But dynamic questions executed poorly can increase dropout rates, reduce tendency to read questions, and even cause respondent confusion when not executed properly.  We have seen designs where a respondent was navigating a space ship and had to “shoot” an item to indicate a response; or were timed to move objects through goal posts. In these instances, an additional layer of cognitive processing involved hand-eye coordination and manipulation with the computer mouse. The resulting data was sporadic as respondents focused more attention on the act of completing the task at hand rather than thinking about the question asked by the researcher.

There are common sense ways to avoid pitfalls when using dynamic questions:

  • Pre-testing: This is a critical step for any elements that stray away from standard question structures. Does the question work on multiple platforms (PC, mobile, tablet)? Is it time intensive for the respondent? Is it self-explanatory so the respondent knows what to do?
  • Teamwork: Good design also requires specialized expertise. While many market researchers may direct hired programmers on how they want their dynamic questions customized or setup, this task is better done in collaboration with a visual designer or usability specialist.
  • Standardization: Data collected by using dynamic question may not be directly comparable to data collected using traditional formats. Any comparisons with previous norms should be done with careful consideration. When employing dynamic questions, develop standards and maintain consistency in how you customize them. That way you can properly interpret the relative value of your data without worrying that the question format is biasing results.
  • Clear Benefit: Your dynamic question may require extra clicks, additional mouse movement, or dragging and physically manipulating objects across the screen. Is there a clear and substantial benefit to having respondents spend this extra time? In other words is your dynamic question that much better than a traditional HTML form?

Dynamic questions can improve the survey experience. As researchers build surveys on multiple platforms and screen sizes, dynamic questions allow the designer greater flexibility to meet this challenge. Dynamic questions offer additional functionality for online surveys where graphical and interactive displays allow the research to capture information in more engaging ways that are not possible in a traditional format. But understand, too, that if not done properly, building new question types can create confusion as respondents encounter something they are unfamiliar with and may use them incorrectly or not in the intended manner.

innovationonline researchonline surveysrespondent engagement

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Aaron Jue

Aaron Jue

Development Director at Electronic Frontier Foundation

1 article

author bio

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

ARTICLES

How to Choose Between Qualitative and Quantitative Testing for Your Research Project
Research Methodologies

How to Choose Between Qualitative and Quantitative Testing for Your Research Project

Learn when to use qualitative vs quantitative research and how modern insights teams combine both for smarter decisions.

Ashley Shedlock

Ashley Shedlock

Content Producer, Editorial & Search Optimization at Greenbook

Back to the Roots: Why Panel Design Matters More than Ever
Research Methodologies

Back to the Roots: Why Panel Design Matters More than Ever

Jennifer Reid argues that strong panel design and persistent identity improve fraud detection and drive more meaningful, trustworthy insights.

Jennifer Reid

Jennifer Reid

Co-CEO and Chief Methodologist at Rival Group

Beyond Churn: A Practical Guide to Learning Customer Retention Research
Research Methodologies

Beyond Churn: A Practical Guide to Learning Customer Retention Research

Discover how to learn retention research using CX, analytics, and AI tools to reduce churn and build loyalty.

Ashley Shedlock

Ashley Shedlock

Content Producer, Editorial & Search Optimization at Greenbook

The Insights Industry Has a Decision Problem — And It’s Costing Companies Millions
Research Methodologies

Partner Content

The Insights Industry Has a Decision Problem — And It’s Costing Companies Millions

Companies don’t lack insights, they lack activation. Discover why valuable research goes unused and how real-time intelligence drives better decisions...

Evan Williams

Evan Williams

Executive Strategy Consultant at Stravito AB

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers