Question 1

When should I run IDIs after a survey to explain unexpected results?

Accepted Answer

You should schedule in-depth interviews (IDIs) whenever a survey yields puzzling or unexpected findings that need more context and explanation. This typically means right after analyzing the survey results-while the data is still fresh-to probe into the why behind the numbers. For example, if a particular segment of respondents gave an unusual answer pattern or a key metric moved opposite to expectations, follow-up IDIs with some of those participants can clarify their reasoning or reveal hidden factors. It's best not to wait; conducting interviews soon after ensures people still recall their survey responses and that insights can feed into decisions promptly. In short, plan IDIs as the next step whenever the survey alone doesn't tell the full story of your findings.

Question 2

Can AI unify cross-channel data without over-attributing impact?

Accepted Answer

Yes, AI can unify cross-channel marketing data into a holistic view that fairly attributes impact, but it needs careful design to avoid over-crediting any one channel. Advanced AI-driven attribution models (for example, using machine learning or Shapley value-based algorithms) can ingest data from all touchpoints — social, email, search, offline — and assign proportional credit to each. The key is training the model on accurate conversion data and setting constraints or validation checks so it doesn't blindly favor the last click or the most frequent channel. When implemented correctly, the AI recognizes how channels work together (say, a social ad that assists a later search click) and distributes credit accordingly. Properly calibrated, an AI attribution system avoids the common pitfall of giving too much weight to easily trackable channels and instead provides a balanced read on what drives conversions.

Question 3

What audit practices satisfy governance requirements for AI-assisted qual?

Accepted Answer

When you use AI in qualitative research, set up processes that leave an audit trail and ensure human oversight, so you meet governance standards. First, document everything: what data you fed the AI (e.g., interview transcripts), which tool or model was used, and what results it produced (summaries, themes, etc.). This way, an auditor or team lead can later trace how conclusions were reached. Second, keep humans in the loop: have researchers or auditors review a sample of AI-generated outputs against the original qualitative data to verify accuracy and check for any bias or misinterpretation. If the AI is helping code responses or find themes, double-check that it isn't systematically missing a certain theme or skewing one way. Third, protect privacy: strip out or anonymize personal identifiers in the text before analyzing it with AI, and use approved secure tools so sensitive data isn't exposed. By combining thorough record-keeping, regular validation checks, and strict privacy safeguards, you create a governance-friendly framework for AI-assisted qual.

Question 4

What challenges arise when comparing influencer impact across regions?

Accepted Answer

Comparing influencer impact across regions is challenging because social media ecosystems and audience behaviors differ widely by market; for example, an influencer might get huge engagement on a dominant platform in one country (like WeChat in China or Instagram in the West) but have minimal reach in another. Metrics don't always translate--a "good" engagement rate in one region could be weak in another due to different norms, and data access varies too (privacy laws or platform APIs might limit what you can measure). Cultural context matters: content that sparks massive influence in one culture might fall flat elsewhere. To make fair comparisons, companies often calibrate benchmarks for each region or rely on local experts to interpret the numbers in context.

Question 5

When is digital ethnography most valuable for brand storytelling?

Accepted Answer

Digital ethnography is most valuable for brand storytelling when you need to uncover authentic consumer narratives and context from their online behavior. It excels at times when your audience is active on social media or forums and you want to see how they organically talk about your product or category in real life. For example, a company might analyze discussions, posts, and videos shared by users to understand the language and emotions they associate with the brand, capturing details that wouldn't surface in a formal survey. This is especially useful when traditional in-person ethnography isn't feasible or when trying to grasp cultural nuances at scale across different regions. Insights from digital ethnography — like common memes, stories, or pain points consumers mention — can then be woven into brand storytelling to make it more relatable and credible, rooted in how people truly experience the brand.

Adler Weiner Research

Why choose Us

What is Adler Weiner Research?

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

When should I run IDIs after a survey to explain unexpected results?

Can AI unify cross-channel data without over-attributing impact?

What audit practices satisfy governance requirements for AI-assisted qual?

What challenges arise when comparing influencer impact across regions?

When is digital ethnography most valuable for brand storytelling?