Question 1

How do we steer stakeholders away from defaulting to generic promise language?

Accepted Answer

To shift stakeholders away from using generic promise language, present evidence and examples that specific, insight-driven messaging works better. Start by showing how boilerplate claims ("high quality," "great value") fail to differentiate--perhaps via customer feedback or testing results where generic statements fell flat. Then provide concrete alternatives drawn from research: for instance, a message that highlights a precise benefit or even uses customers' own words. An A/B test or concept test can be persuasive: when stakeholders see that a specific promise (grounded in actual customer needs) outperforms a vague one, they'll be more willing to change. Frame this shift as enhancing effectiveness rather than just wordsmithing--position the move to specific language as a way to better resonate with the target audience and drive real results.

Question 2

How should we recruit early adopters without over-indexing novelty seekers?

Accepted Answer

Recruit early adopters by focusing on people who have a real stake in the problem your innovation solves, rather than those who chase every new gadget. In practice, this means using screening criteria that identify users with relevant domain experience or unmet needs related to your product, not just general tech enthusiasm. For example, if you're testing a new healthcare app, prioritize participants who manage their health digitally or seek better solutions, rather than those who join every beta just for novelty. Mix recruitment channels to avoid homogeneous "novelty-seeker" pools: tap professional forums, user communities, and referrals where genuine interest runs high. By carefully crafting screeners and sourcing from targeted communities, you'll capture insightful early adopters who provide meaningful feedback, instead of an unrepresentative group of thrill-seekers.

Question 3

What do AI models need to predict path to purchase journeys?

Accepted Answer

AI (Artificial Intelligence) models can accurately predict path-to-purchase journeys only if they're trained on rich, integrated customer data covering all the key digital and offline touchpoints leading up to a sale. This means feeding the model a large volume of historical journey data — sequences of events like ad views, website clicks, social media interactions, and store visits — each tied to whether they eventually resulted in a purchase. The model also needs relevant context about each customer (such as demographics or past purchase history) and timing (like intervals between touchpoints) to learn which factors influence different paths. With comprehensive, well-organized data and clear purchase outcome labels, an AI system can recognize patterns in how a prospect becomes a buyer; without those inputs, any path-to-purchase predictions will likely be unreliable.

Question 4

What practices improve accuracy in scenario planning in research?

Accepted Answer

Scenario planning becomes more reliable when researchers use diverse data inputs and actively challenge assumptions to craft plausible futures. Best practices include incorporating interdisciplinary perspectives and historical analogues so scenarios aren't just reflections of current biases. Quantifying key drivers — for example, using trend data or simulations for each scenario's assumptions — adds rigor to these what-if narratives. It's also important to engage subject matter experts to review and stress-test each scenario, which can expose blind spots or overly optimistic thinking. Defining clear signposts (early indicators for each scenario) further improves accuracy by letting teams monitor which future is unfolding and adjust plans accordingly. By regularly updating scenarios as new information emerges — and combining data-driven modeling with creative foresight — scenario planning yields more credible, actionable guidance for strategic decisions.

Question 5

How do shared assets reduce duplicate commissioning across regions?

Accepted Answer

Shared research assets reduce duplicate commissioning across regions by giving all teams visibility into existing studies so they don't inadvertently reinvent the wheel. Many organizations enable this through a global knowledge portal or research repository that all regional teams can access. For example, if one country or business unit has already run a customer survey or focus group, teams elsewhere can find that report in the shared repository and reuse those insights instead of funding a similar project from scratch. This practice prevents significant wasted budget and time on redundant work while also promoting consistency — everyone is building on the same methodologies and findings. In short, shared assets break down silos and ensure each new study truly adds fresh value rather than duplicating what's been done elsewhere.

Avasta

What is Avasta?

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How do we steer stakeholders away from defaulting to generic promise language?

How should we recruit early adopters without over-indexing novelty seekers?

What do AI models need to predict path to purchase journeys?

What practices improve accuracy in scenario planning in research?

How do shared assets reduce duplicate commissioning across regions?