Question 1

How can digital ethnography better include marginalized online communities?

Accepted Answer

Digital ethnography can be made more inclusive of marginalized online communities by meeting those groups where they are and building genuine trust. Researchers should seek out the platforms and forums these communities actually use (often smaller or private online spaces) rather than expecting them to appear in mainstream channels. Engage with community leaders or members to obtain permission and guidance, and ensure research activities respect cultural norms and privacy concerns (for example, using anonymized profiles and transparent intentions). Diverse research teams can also improve inclusion; having moderators or analysts who share background with the community helps interpret context and avoid missteps. For instance, to study a marginalized youth subculture, an ethnographer might spend time on their preferred messaging boards or social apps, gradually earning trust before asking questions. By approaching on the community's terms and safeguarding their comfort, digital ethnography can capture insights from voices often overlooked.

Question 2

How is qual-at-scale changing stakeholder expectations for turnaround and depth?

Accepted Answer

Qualitative research at scale is raising the bar on both speed and substance, so stakeholders now expect quick turnarounds without sacrificing insight depth. With tech-enabled qual (like large online communities or AI-driven text analysis), what once took weeks can yield findings in days, and clients have noticed. They increasingly assume they can get rich, qualitative feedback almost in real time, similar to quantitative results. This means a product manager might expect key themes and quotes from hundreds of interviews just a few days after fielding. At the same time, stakeholders still want depth — nuanced insights, emotional context, and illustrative stories — not just cursory stats. To meet these expectations, researchers are using tools that rapidly analyze open-ends or video responses to surface patterns, then layering human analysis to provide context and meaning. In short, qual-at-scale has taught stakeholders that you can have both speed and storytelling, and they're beginning to demand it as the norm for qualitative projects.

Question 3

Does a higher NPS always indicate higher loyalty or future growth?

Accepted Answer

A high Net Promoter Score (NPS) often signals strong customer sentiment, but it isn't a guarantee of loyalty or growth by itself. Context matters: a company could have a sky-high NPS yet see flat growth if the market is saturated or a competitor lures customers away with better deals. Likewise, NPS measures willingness to recommend, which doesn't always translate into behavior — someone might give you a 9 or 10 but still switch to a rival if a cheaper option appears. Think of NPS as a positive indicator, not a promise. It's wise to cross-check a high NPS with actual behavior metrics like repeat purchase rate, retention/churn, and revenue trends. If those metrics are rising alongside NPS, you're likely building real loyalty and growth. But if NPS is high and the hard numbers aren't moving, it flags that something else (pricing, competition, product issues) might be holding back growth. In sum, a higher NPS is encouraging but should always be validated against what customers are actually doing.

Question 4

Will data-residency rules change how we centralize global datasets?

Accepted Answer

Yes, strict data residency rules are forcing companies to rethink centralizing all their data in one place, leading to more regionalized or federated data architectures. Many countries now require that personal data about their citizens stays within national borders (for example, the EU's GDPR can require EU data to stay in Europe, and countries like China or Australia have their own residency laws). This means a multinational that once kept a single global database might now maintain separate data stores in each region and only share aggregated or anonymized insights across borders. Instead of one giant data lake, organizations are moving to architectures where data is distributed but can be queried or combined securely when needed. It changes how companies govern and analyze data: they must invest in multi-region cloud or hybrid solutions and carefully manage compliance in each locale. In short, data residency regulations are breaking the old model of one central repository and replacing it with a network of locally anchored datasets connected by secure pipelines.

Question 5

Can remote ethnography deliver quality comparable to in-person work?

Accepted Answer

A well-executed remote ethnography can deliver insights close to the quality of in-person fieldwork, though it requires careful planning to bridge the distance. With today's technology--high-quality video calls, smartphone cameras, and digital diaries--researchers can observe participants in their natural environment and capture rich qualitative data without being physically present. In fact, remote ethnography can sometimes reach more diverse locations and make participants feel more at ease in their own homes, which adds authenticity. However, there are trade-offs: you might miss some contextual details or subtle non-verbal cues that an on-site researcher would catch, and building rapport through a screen can take extra effort. Overall, remote ethnography can yield very comparable findings for many topics, as long as moderators use the right tools (multiple camera angles, screen-sharing, follow-up interviews) and preparation to compensate for the lack of physical presence.

BVA BDRC

Why choose Us

What is BVA BDRC?

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How can digital ethnography better include marginalized online communities?

How is qual-at-scale changing stakeholder expectations for turnaround and depth?

Does a higher NPS always indicate higher loyalty or future growth?

Will data-residency rules change how we centralize global datasets?

Can remote ethnography deliver quality comparable to in-person work?