Question 1

When should packaging research be paired with path-to-purchase studies?

Accepted Answer

Pair packaging research with path-to-purchase studies when you need to understand how a product's package influences shoppers in context. If you're launching a new packaging design or trying to gauge its shelf impact, it's often beneficial to embed that test within a broader shopper journey study. For example, you might track a customer from the moment they enter a store (or browse online) to the point of decision, while also testing if the new package catches their eye or communicates effectively at the shelf. This combined approach is useful when packaging is a key variable in conversion: it shows whether an attractive design actually helps move consumers from consideration to purchase. In short, whenever packaging could be a deciding factor in the shopping process (especially for new products or rebrands), integrating it with a path-to-purchase analysis ensures you measure its real-world impact, not just its standalone appeal.

Question 2

How do I design scales that minimize bias across cultures?

Accepted Answer

Design cross-cultural survey scales with neutral wording and clear, culturally appropriate anchors to minimize response biases across different cultures. Make sure each scale point is well-defined and equivalent in meaning after translation, avoiding idioms or emotional terms that might skew responses in one culture versus another. One best practice is to use balanced scales (with an equal mix of positive and negative phrasing or symmetric options) so that people aren't led toward agreement. For example, instead of a simple agree/disagree format — which some cultures might consistently agree with — pose direct questions with specific frequency or intensity options (e.g., "Daily" to "Never") to get more objective answers. Consider using visuals or icon-based scales (like smiley-to-frown faces or other universal symbols) to create consistency in interpretation; imagery can reduce reliance on language nuances. Also ensure that numeric scales are interpreted correctly: clarify which end is positive (since in some places "1" is seen as the top score, while elsewhere "10" is highest). Finally, test your scales in each culture and adjust any wording or format that seems to cause bias, ensuring that responses can be compared fairly across markets.

Question 3

How should we handle multi-stakeholder decision units in sampling?

Accepted Answer

When dealing with purchase decisions made by a group of stakeholders, make sure your sample represents all the key roles in that decision unit. In a B2B context, for example, one deal might involve an end user, a technical evaluator, and a financial decision-maker. If you only survey one of them, you'll get a one-sided view. So you might recruit multiple people from each client company or tag respondents by role (user, influencer, buyer, etc.) and ensure you have each role covered per decision. That way, you can see where opinions align or conflict — maybe the technical team loves a solution but the finance exec has reservations. Understanding those dynamics is crucial. You could also consider qualitative methods like conducting a group interview with representatives of each role to watch how they collectively discuss a choice, although coordinating that can be challenging. The bottom line is to design your research to capture input from every stakeholder who has a say. Then, analyze both individual perspectives and the combined picture to truly understand how the group will decide.

Question 4

When is snowball sampling a reasonable and better option than other methods?

Accepted Answer

Snowball sampling is a reasonable — and sometimes superior — option when studying a population that is hard to reach or lacks a readily available sampling frame. It shines in situations where members of a niche or sensitive group know each other and trust is key, because initial participants can refer researchers to others like them. For example, if you need insights from a very specialized community or a stigmatized population (say, early adopters of a cutting-edge technology or individuals with a rare condition), traditional random sampling might yield few respondents, whereas snowball referrals quickly build a network of willing participants. It's also useful when the target group is small or hidden and contact information isn't publicly accessible. In those cases, snowball sampling often outperforms more formal methods by leveraging social connections. The trade-off is that it won't be fully representative of the broader population, but when access is the main hurdle, snowball sampling becomes the most practical and effective approach.

Question 5

Are shorter attention spans changing expectations for UXR task time?

Accepted Answer

Yes, shorter attention spans are pushing UX researchers to design quicker, more focused user tasks. Participants today are less willing to sit through lengthy, step-by-step usability sessions, especially on mobile, so teams are trimming test scenarios down to the essentials. We see more micro-tasks and split sessions — where a 30-minute study might be broken into two 15-minute sessions — to keep engagement high. This shift means stakeholders also expect faster turnaround on insights, as studies that respect limited attention can be conducted rapidly without sacrificing depth on the most critical user interactions. For instance, instead of a single 30-minute usability session, teams might break it into a few 10-minute tasks or add interactive prompts in between to reset focus and keep participants engaged despite shorter attention spans.

Canadian Viewpoint Inc.

Why choose Us

Features and attributes

What is Canadian Viewpoint Inc.?

Recognition & Certifications

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

When should packaging research be paired with path-to-purchase studies?

How do I design scales that minimize bias across cultures?

How should we handle multi-stakeholder decision units in sampling?

When is snowball sampling a reasonable and better option than other methods?

Are shorter attention spans changing expectations for UXR task time?