Question 1

How do I prove ROI from investing in medical device usability research?

Accepted Answer

ROI from medical device usability research becomes evident when you show how it prevented costly issues and improved product success. If early usability tests caught design flaws or user errors that would have led to expensive fixes, regulatory setbacks, or even safety risks, quantify those averted costs as returns on the research investment. Also, link the research to positive outcomes: for instance, a device refined via usability feedback might see higher adoption by clinicians or patients, leading to better sales or fewer support calls. Medical device firms often face strict FDA human factors requirements, so meeting those smoothly thanks to good research avoids delays — that time and expense saved is part of the ROI story as well. By compiling these proof points (costs avoided, faster approvals, improved user satisfaction), you make a compelling case for the value generated by the usability studies.

Question 2

What practices ensure SMB surveys capture decision-makers rather than employees?

Accepted Answer

To have your SMB (small and mid-sized business) survey reach actual decision-makers rather than random employees, be very deliberate in sampling and screening. First, source your sample from channels likely to include owners or executives - for instance, use a panel or email list that allows you to target respondents by job title (owners, CEOs, managing directors) or select by role in the business. Next, use screening questions at the start of the survey to confirm the person's decision-making authority. You might directly ask something like, "Are you the primary decision-maker for purchasing X at your company?" and disqualify those who say no. You can also design the survey in a way that signals it's for decision-makers: include a few questions about budgets, strategy, or other high-level topics that an ordinary employee wouldn't confidently answer. Non-decision-makers often self-select out when they see the content isn't relevant to them. By combining targeted outreach and strong screeners, you increase the odds that your respondents are the people in charge (and that the insights you gather reflect the views of true business decision-makers).

Question 3

How is the cookieless future reshaping cross-channel insights?

Accepted Answer

The end of third-party cookies is forcing a fundamental shift in how cross-channel insights are gathered and analyzed. Without cookie-based tracking to follow individuals across websites and devices, marketers must lean on first-party data integration, privacy-safe partnerships, and advanced modeling to understand customer journeys. For example, companies are turning to data clean rooms and identity solutions to connect ad exposures with sales across channels in a compliant way. Multi-touch attribution is giving way to techniques like marketing mix modeling and predictive analytics that infer patterns without individual-level tracking. In short, the cookieless future is reshaping cross-channel insight generation to be more cohort-based and consent-driven — demanding that insight teams use creative new methods to piece together a holistic view of campaign performance across platforms.

Question 4

When should qualitative follow surveys to decode financial advice misalignment?

Accepted Answer

Follow-up qualitative research should be done after a survey when there's a clear misalignment in financial advice perceptions that numbers alone can't explain. If a survey reveals, for example, that clients aren't following their advisor's recommendations despite claiming to be satisfied, interviews or focus groups can probe why. Qualitative methods are ideal whenever data shows a disconnect — advisors might think they're communicating clearly while clients feel confused or mistrustful. In those cases, talking directly to clients and advisors helps decode emotions, misunderstandings, or unmet needs behind the survey responses. In short, whenever quantitative findings on financial advice don't add up or reveal a gap in expectations, a qualitative deep dive should follow to uncover the "why."

Question 5

How do we encourage stakeholders to use portals before asking for new studies?

Accepted Answer

The best way to get stakeholders using a research portal is to make it their fastest path to answers - in other words, show that checking the portal is easier than commissioning a new study. This starts with keeping the portal well-organized and up to date, so users trust that a quick search will surface relevant past insights. Some companies integrate the portal into everyday workflows, for example by embedding links to it in project request forms or team chat bots, nudging people to look there first. Highlighting success stories can help too ("Look how Product X team saved time by finding existing data in the portal"). The key is to demonstrate value: when stakeholders see that the portal saves them effort and provides credible information on demand, they naturally turn to it instead of reflexively asking for new research.

CatalystMR

Why choose Us

Features and attributes

What is CatalystMR?

Recognition

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How do I prove ROI from investing in medical device usability research?

What practices ensure SMB surveys capture decision-makers rather than employees?

How is the cookieless future reshaping cross-channel insights?

When should qualitative follow surveys to decode financial advice misalignment?

How do we encourage stakeholders to use portals before asking for new studies?