Question 1

How should we handle brand crises inside ongoing tracking waves?

Accepted Answer

When a brand crisis hits during an ongoing tracker, adjust your research so you capture the impact without skewing your trends. Add crisis-specific questions to your survey (e.g., ask if people heard about the issue and how it changed their view) to explain any sudden metric shifts. If possible, run a quick pulse survey at the crisis peak to track immediate sentiment changes that a normal schedule might miss. When analyzing results, isolate the crisis-period data from your usual trend. That way you can clearly attribute a steep drop (e.g., in NPS) to the incident and show how much it recovers afterward. Be very clear in reporting: flag that "this dip was due to the crisis," so it's not mistaken for an ordinary trend change. After the crisis, return to your regular cadence. In summary, being transparent and tackling the crisis data head-on keeps your tracker credible through the turmoil.

Question 2

What data-privacy differences matter most for mobile studies across regions?

Accepted Answer

The most critical data-privacy differences for mobile studies across regions involve varying laws and cultural expectations about personal data. For example, Europe's GDPR requires explicit opt-in consent for collecting personal information (like location or device IDs) and grants participants rights to access or delete their data, making robust consent screens and disclosures essential in EU mobile research. In the US, laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) also protect mobile data but focus more on transparency and giving users the ability to opt out rather than upfront consent. Other regions impose their own rules — some countries mandate that data about their citizens be stored within national borders (data residency laws), affecting where you host mobile research data. Even cultural attitudes toward privacy differ (continuous GPS tracking might be fine in one market but considered intrusive in another). In short, pay attention to each region's consent standards, definitions of sensitive data, and data handling requirements, and tailor your mobile research practices accordingly to remain compliant and trustworthy.

Question 3

What role do mobile apps now play in shaping in-store decisions?

Accepted Answer

Mobile apps have essentially become personal shopping assistants that influence decisions right in the store aisle. Shoppers frequently use retailer or brand apps while they shop — to get digital coupons, scan QR codes or barcodes for more product info, and even read reviews on the spot. By providing real-time information (like ingredients or price comparisons) and personalized offers, these apps can sway what goes into the cart. Location-aware features play a role too: for instance, an app might send you a push notification about a sale on coffee when you're near the coffee aisle, directly shaping your purchase consideration. Loyalty and payment apps also streamline the experience (think of how Starbucks' app influences in-store orders with rewards and easy pay, or grocery apps enable scan-and-go). In short, mobile apps bridge online and offline shopping by giving consumers on-demand guidance and incentives in store, which means they now heavily shape in-store decision-making and have become a key focus in shopper research.

Question 4

What ethical considerations surface in pricing research for essential goods?

Accepted Answer

Pricing research for essential goods (e.g. staple foods, vital medications) must be handled with an extra layer of ethical caution focused on fairness and access. Unlike luxury items, essential goods are needs, so exploiting willingness-to-pay could harm vulnerable people. An obvious consideration is price gouging: just because research shows some consumers would pay a very high price for a necessary drug doesn't mean it's ethical to charge it. You should factor in ability to pay and the societal impact of your pricing recommendations. Often this means considering tiered pricing or ensuring a basic affordability threshold. Transparency and non-discrimination are also key. If your research explores different prices for different groups or regions, ask whether that could be seen as unfair or predatory. Any segmentation (like charging more in wealthier areas) should be weighed against the principle that essentials should be broadly accessible. When conducting studies (surveys, focus groups) on essential goods, be sensitive in how questions are phrased — participants may have strong emotions about cost and access to necessities. It's often wise to involve an ethics review or stakeholder input when interpreting the results. In sum, pricing research for essentials requires balancing business insights with moral responsibility. The outcomes should guide towards sustainable pricing that keeps the product available to those who need it, rather than merely extracting the highest possible margin.

Question 5

How can I demonstrate ROI from inclusive research practices?

Accepted Answer

Inclusive research practices can show clear ROI (Return on Investment) by linking diverse consumer insights to tangible business outcomes, like reaching new markets and avoiding costly missteps. For example, broadening a study to include underrepresented segments might uncover unmet needs that lead to new products or improvements - driving incremental revenue and customer growth - and it also helps avoid expensive mistakes by catching cultural or accessibility issues early, preventing potential PR crises or product flops that would hurt the company's bottom line. In practice, to prove ROI internally, you can track outcomes such as revenue from newly engaged demographics, higher customer satisfaction scores across diverse groups, and even cost savings from not having to redo campaigns thanks to getting insights right the first time.

Sylvestre & Co.

What is Sylvestre & Co.?

Recognition

Services and Expertise

Research Resources

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How should we handle brand crises inside ongoing tracking waves?

What data-privacy differences matter most for mobile studies across regions?

What role do mobile apps now play in shaping in-store decisions?

What ethical considerations surface in pricing research for essential goods?

How can I demonstrate ROI from inclusive research practices?