Categories
November 3, 2025
At IIEX.AI, leaders revealed how behavioral science and AI merge to scale empathy, predict behavior, and drive more human-centered insights.
The story of AI in research has long been told through a lens of automation — faster analysis, cheaper data, streamlined workflows. But at IIEX.AI this year, a different narrative took hold. From Melina Palmer’s deep dive into the psychology of change, to Perrigo’s use of emotionally intelligent AI personas, to InsightsNow’s behavioral modeling of consumer habits, one idea pulsed through every conversation: the most powerful AI doesn’t just crunch data — it understands behavior.
Behavioral AI is emerging as the connective tissue between human psychology and machine intelligence. It’s redefining how we decode motivation, design experiences, and translate data into action. And perhaps most importantly, it’s revealing a new vision of the insights professional, one who uses AI not to replace human understanding, but to scale it.
Behavioral economist Melina Palmer, CEO of The Brainy Business, opened her IIEX.AI session with a deceptively simple provocation: “Most change initiatives fail not because the data is wrong, but because the people weren’t ready.”
Her point? Even in the age of intelligent systems, human decision-making remains gloriously irrational and driven by habit, framing, and emotion. Palmer unpacked three behavioral mistakes companies make when implementing change: disrespecting the status quo, ignoring the frame, and communicating poorly.
Take the infamous Tropicana rebrand, where a “fresh” new design triggered a 20% sales drop and a $50 million loss. The data supported modernization, but the team underestimated consumers’ emotional bond with the original packaging. Palmer reminded the audience that humans make 35,000 decisions per day with each one being a negotiation between comfort and curiosity. When too much shifts at once, cognitive overload sets in.
The same principle applies to AI adoption itself. Whether it’s a new insights platform or an organizational overhaul, behavioral change succeeds when teams respect defaults, align metaphors, and frame messages for trust. In other words: before machines can understand people, organizations must first understand their own humans.
That bridge between psychology and technology took concrete form in the session led by Will Leach (Mind State Group) and Seth Minsk (Perrigo). Their challenge was one every researcher knows too well: shrinking budgets, exploding data, and a seat at the table that’s always one presentation away from being pulled out.
Perrigo, best known as the world’s largest manufacturer of store-brand OTC healthcare products, needed a leap forward in understanding consumers across categories like women’s health, menopause, and over-the-counter pain management. Their solution: a Behavioral Intelligence (BeVi) framework that trains AI models to think and feel like real customers.
They call these models “EQ Personas.” Each one is built through a three-step process:
The result isn’t just another chatbot. It’s an always-on voice of the customer — an interactive behavioral twin that can act as a strategist, copywriter, ad reviewer, or ideation partner.
Leach described it succinctly: “AI doesn’t eliminate the human touch — it allows us to have that touch at scale.”
This hybrid of behavioral science and machine learning signals a new paradigm: researchers as trainers of intelligence. Instead of chasing the next insight deck, they’re teaching algorithms to emulate empathy, cognitive bias, and emotional nuance — the very elements that make humans unpredictable and fascinating.
If Perrigo’s EQ Personas represent behavioral AI as empathy, Greg Stucky of InsightsNow showed what it looks like as pattern recognition. His team has built an AI-powered insights framework that moves beyond product testing to behavioral mapping, identifying storylines that shape human decisions.
In a case study with GLP-1 users (the rapidly growing population using weight-management drugs), InsightsNow analyzed data from 35,000 consumers discussing food and wellness experiences. AI agents parsed the conversations for motivations, emotions, and “jobs-to-be-done,” surfacing five snacking moments that defined the category — from on-the-go fuel to guilt-free indulgence.
Crucially, the system didn’t just summarize sentiment. It conversed with the data, testing hypotheses and generating behavioral “white spaces” for new product opportunities. One unmet need rose to the top: the lack of clearly labeled “GLP-1-friendly” snacks. Within weeks, those insights informed cross-functional teams in packaging, R&D, and creative strategy.
Stucky’s takeaway captured the energy in the room: “We’re moving from making products people like, to designing experiences that nudge behaviors forward.”
What unites these three examples is not the technology itself, but the philosophy behind it. Behavioral AI isn’t about building systems that outthink humans, it’s about building systems that think with humans.
This shift reframes AI as a partner in behavioral understanding rather than a productivity hack. It also demands a new skill set for insights professionals — one part psychologist, one part systems thinker. Instead of extracting insights from data, they’ll curate relationships with data: training, conversing, and iterating with digital agents that mirror real-world emotion and motivation.
In this sense, behavioral AI marks a return to the discipline’s human roots. The earliest behavioral economists — from Kahneman to Thaler — sought to decode the irrational patterns behind everyday choices. Now, we have the computational power to model those very same patterns at scale.
At its best, behavioral AI transforms insights work from retrospective analysis to predictive empathy. It doesn’t just tell us what people did, it helps us understand why they might do it again.
Imagine an insights function that can simulate consumer response before a single dollar is spent on media, or a brand strategist who can iterate creative directions in real time with a virtual focus group trained on behavioral science principles.
That’s not the future — that’s the present being piloted by companies like Perrigo and InsightsNow.
As Melina Palmer might put it, success in this new era depends on framing change the right way. The question isn’t whether AI will replace human judgment. The real question is: how human can we make our machines — and how intelligently can we scale our humanity?
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Ashley Shedlock
Four qualitative leaders share how to balance convenience, cost, and connection in online focus groups—and what comes next with AI and hybrid qual.
IIEX.AI revealed how insights leaders are redefining work, creativity, and strategy through AI without losing the human edge that drives meaning.
Explore how AI-powered tools like Compeers AI, DeepSights, and CoLoop are transforming data analysis...
Ready to break up with focus groups? From mobile ethnography to AI, discover the methods that capture the real user story.
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.