Question 1

When are projective techniques the best choice in research decisions?

Accepted Answer

Projective techniques are the best choice when you need to uncover emotions or motivations that people can't articulate through direct questioning. They shine in situations where respondents might be unwilling or unable to share their true opinions — for instance, unspoken anxieties in financial decisions or aspirational feelings toward a luxury brand. By having participants project feelings onto metaphors, imagery, or hypothetical scenarios (like describing a brand as an animal or color), these methods reveal subconscious attitudes that traditional surveys might miss. The trade-off is that results are interpretive and require skilled analysis, but when the goal is rich insight into the "why" behind consumer behavior, projective exercises offer a uniquely powerful window into consumer psychology and decision drivers.

Question 2

How well do short vertical videos balance message takeout with attention gains

Accepted Answer

Short vertical videos (think TikTok or Instagram Reels) excel at grabbing attention, but they often struggle to convey a deep message or complex information in the few seconds they have. These bite-sized, smartphone-friendly clips are designed for quick engagement — viewers tend to watch them all the way through since they're so short — so the upside is high completion rates and immediate impact. However, the trade-off is that message "takeout" (what the viewer remembers or learns) can be limited to a simple point or feeling. For example, a 15-second vertical ad might imprint the brand logo and a fun vibe, which is great for awareness, but it probably can't communicate detailed product features or nuanced benefits. To balance this, creators use tactics like bold on-screen text or catchy slogans to reinforce the key takeaway, making sure that even as the format maximizes attention, the core message isn't lost in the blink-and-you-miss-it format. Overall, short vertical videos win on capturing eyeballs, but marketers must be very deliberate to ensure the important message sticks in that brief window.

Question 3

How can I prove ROI from in-store merchandising research?

Accepted Answer

To prove return on investment (ROI) from in-store merchandising research, link the insights to tangible improvements in sales or efficiency and quantify the before-and-after impact. For example, if the research suggested a new shelf layout and you implemented it in select stores, track the sales lift or basket size increase in those test stores versus control stores that kept the old layout; a significant uptick in revenue, after accounting for costs, directly demonstrates ROI. If sales data isn't straightforward, look at related metrics like improved product visibility (measured by shopper observations) leading to higher conversion rates, or time saved by staff due to a better stocking system. The key is isolating the effect of the merchandising changes: use a control vs. experimental setup or compare pre- and post-change figures while keeping other factors constant (no big promos skewing the results). By translating the research outcomes into dollar figures — like a percentage sales increase or cost saving attributed to the new display — stakeholders can clearly see that the study paid off and was worth the investment.

Question 4

What challenges arise when deploying one model across multiple countries?

Accepted Answer

Deploying one AI model across multiple countries often runs into problems with language, culture, and data regulations. A model trained on one country's data may misinterpret inputs elsewhere--for example, it might not understand the local language or slang, or it could make predictions based on consumer behavior patterns that don't hold true in another market. Cultural differences can trip it up: something seen as a positive trend or friendly tone in one region might have a different meaning (or no meaning) in another. Additionally, each country has its own data environment and rules; you might face strict privacy laws in one region (like GDPR in Europe) that limit the data you can use or share, complicating a one-model-fits-all approach. Because of these challenges, companies often retrain or fine-tune models with local data and adjust them for each market's language and norms. In practice, a model that works perfectly at home will usually need some localization and re-testing to perform reliably in other countries.

Question 5

How should in-store research adapt to declining foot traffic?

Accepted Answer

In-store research should adapt to declining foot traffic by becoming more flexible and omnichannel. One approach is to complement the shrinking in-person sample with digital outreach. If fewer people are walking in, engage them through their smartphones or computers instead: send quick mobile surveys via your store's app, or follow up with online shoppers to ask about their experience (and why they maybe skipped a store visit). You can also use loyalty or sales data to identify customers who haven't visited lately and reach out via email or text for their feedback. For those who do come into the store, make each interaction count by gathering deeper insights from the smaller pool. Conduct detailed shop-alongs or exit interviews to understand their behavior and needs more thoroughly. Additionally, consider moving some research outside the store - for instance, set up a feedback booth at a community event or near a store entrance to catch input from passersby who might not be shopping inside. By blending limited in-store observations with online surveys, mobile feedback, and outreach in alternative venues, you can still gather meaningful shopper insights even as traditional foot traffic declines.

Criba Research LATAM & España

Why choose Us

What is Criba Research LATAM & España?

Recognition

Research Facility

Research Facility Details

Facility Rooms

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

When are projective techniques the best choice in research decisions?

How well do short vertical videos balance message takeout with attention gains

How can I prove ROI from in-store merchandising research?

What challenges arise when deploying one model across multiple countries?

How should in-store research adapt to declining foot traffic?