Question 1

What's the cleanest way to test banking kiosk versus teller journeys?

Accepted Answer

The cleanest way to compare a bank's self-service kiosk experience with a human teller experience is to run a controlled test where customers are randomly assigned to each option for the same task. For instance, you might have a group of customers perform a common transaction — like depositing a check or opening an account — one group using the kiosk and a similar group working with a teller. By measuring outcomes such as transaction time, error rates, and customer satisfaction immediately afterward, you isolate the differences attributable to the channel. Random assignment is key here: it ensures that any differences in results (say, kiosk users finished two minutes faster on average, or teller users felt more reassured) are due to the method of service, not because one group had inherently easier cases or more tech-savvy individuals. This A/B test style approach provides clear, unbiased evidence of how kiosks stack up against tellers for key banking journeys.

Question 2

Can AI tools help track employee sentiment during transformation programs?

Accepted Answer

Yes, AI-based analytics can monitor employee sentiment during major change initiatives by quickly processing feedback at scale. Natural language processing tools, for example, can scan pulse survey comments and internal chat messages (with appropriate privacy safeguards) to detect shifts in tone or recurring concerns in real time. This provides leaders early warning of morale issues or confusion so they can address them proactively rather than waiting for quarterly surveys. For instance, a sudden spike in negative sentiment around "communication" in staff feedback can prompt immediate clarifications from leadership. AI sentiment tracking is most effective when paired with human context — automated tone analysis can flag trends, but managers still need to interpret why employees feel that way. Used thoughtfully, AI can uncover sentiment patterns faster than traditional methods, helping keep transformation programs on track with timely course corrections.

Question 3

Where can AI summarize adopter feedback without biasing feature prioritization?

Accepted Answer

AI (Artificial Intelligence) can be used within your product feedback workflow to summarize adopter feedback in a neutral way that informs but doesn't dictate feature priorities. The best approach is to have AI tools identify common themes and sentiments from user comments or reviews — often via a product management platform or feedback analytics tool. For example, an AI might report that a significant subset of users find onboarding difficult, highlighting it as a common theme without saying it's the top priority. By sticking to summarizing what users are saying (such as the frequency of requests or key pain points) without ranking them, the AI avoids injecting its own bias into prioritization decisions. Product managers then take that unbiased summary and apply strategic judgment. In essence, AI should surface structured insights — like top recurring requests — while leaving the actual prioritization choices to human decision-makers guided by context and business goals.

Question 4

Will busy stakeholders turn to microlearning over workshops for upskilling?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Time-crunched stakeholders are gravitating toward microlearning (short, on-demand lessons) rather than setting aside hours for traditional workshops. Bite-sized modules fit more naturally into a busy schedule — for instance, a manager can watch a 5-10 minute tutorial during a commute or between meetings, instead of trying to attend a half-day training session. This doesn't completely replace workshops (complex or collaborative skills might still need a deeper dive), but for many upskilling needs, microlearning is simply more practical. It offers just-in-time knowledge: stakeholders can pick and choose topics they need in the moment, which increases engagement because the learning feels immediately relevant. Companies are finding that providing a library of quick e-learning videos or interactive snippets gets higher uptake among executives than pushing formal training events. So while workshops still have a place, the trend is toward microlearning as the go-to for continuous development when people are pressed for time.

Question 5

Will instant payments change service expectations in retail banking research?

Accepted Answer

Yes - the rise of instant payments is raising customer expectations for speed and convenience in banking, and that shift is something retail banking research is starting to capture. When people can send or receive money in seconds, they begin to expect similarly immediate service in other areas like customer support, account updates, or resolving issues. For example, a customer who instantly transfers funds might feel frustrated if a card dispute or loan approval still takes days; their baseline for "fast service" has changed. Research surveys and interviews now often probe perceptions of timeliness and real-time responsiveness, reflecting this new standard. In practice, banks may need to explore offering 24/7 support, faster turnaround on requests, and proactive alerts - and consumer research will reveal how much these factors impact satisfaction and loyalty in an era of instant expectations.

Azurite Consulting

Why choose Us

What is Azurite Consulting?

Reviews

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

What's the cleanest way to test banking kiosk versus teller journeys?

Can AI tools help track employee sentiment during transformation programs?

Where can AI summarize adopter feedback without biasing feature prioritization?

Will busy stakeholders turn to microlearning over workshops for upskilling?

Will instant payments change service expectations in retail banking research?