Question 1

Will retirement decumulation needs change our advice research priorities?

Accepted Answer

Yes — growing retirement decumulation needs are shifting advice research priorities toward understanding how retirees draw down their savings. Historically, financial research focused on accumulation (how to invest and save for retirement), but as more clients enter retirement, firms are now prioritizing studies on sustainable withdrawal strategies and post-retirement behaviors. This means examining how retirees actually spend their money, manage longevity risk, and make decisions about things like downsizing or healthcare expenses. For example, research might explore whether retirees prefer a steady income stream from annuities or more flexible drawdown plans, and what guidance helps prevent them from outliving their assets. Insights on decumulation help advisors tailor their advice and develop new tools (like withdrawal calculators or managed payout funds). In short, an aging client base is refocusing research on delivering advice that supports clients through the spend-down phase of retirement, not just the build-up.

Question 2

How should social listening insights integrate with brand tracking studies?

Accepted Answer

Social listening insights should complement and enrich traditional brand tracking metrics by providing a fuller picture of brand health. In practice, this means taking unstructured data from social media (consumer sentiment, trending topics, volume of mentions) and aligning it with brand tracking metrics such as brand awareness, consideration, or sentiment scores from surveys. For example, if the brand tracker shows a sudden dip in favorability in a certain month, social listening might reveal a viral customer complaint or negative news story that explains the drop. By incorporating social data, you can validate and contextualize your survey results: spikes or dips in brand measures can be cross-checked against social chatter for confirmation. These insights are best included in brand tracking reports or dashboards as qualitative context or early-warning signals. The key is to integrate carefully - filter social data for relevance and avoid over-weighting it, using it as a diagnostic layer alongside steady, representative tracking data.

Question 3

When should we use dubbing versus subtitling when testing concepts globally?

Accepted Answer

It depends on the audience and the importance of the original audio. Use dubbing when you want participants in each country to experience the concept as if it were made for them, without the extra effort of reading text. Dubbing is often best if the visuals are complex or the emotional tone in voice is critical - it helps ensure comprehension because viewers can focus on the imagery and message in their own language. On the other hand, subtitling can be effective when you need to preserve the original audio (say the voice of the original actor or spokesperson is important to the concept) but still provide translation. Subtitles are usually quicker and cheaper than producing multiple dubbed versions, and in markets where people are used to subtitles, it won't be a big barrier. So, if native-language immersion and ease of understanding are top priority (and budget allows), lean towards dubbing. If authenticity of execution or speed is more important - and the audience can handle reading - subtitling is a solid choice.

Question 4

What are best practices for translating fiduciary terms across jurisdictions?

Accepted Answer

Translating fiduciary terms across jurisdictions is best done by combining subject-matter expertise with careful localization. Start with a clear definition of the term in its original context (for example, what exactly 'fiduciary duty' entails in the source country's legal framework). Then work with professional translators or legal advisors in the target jurisdiction to find an equivalent concept or phrase - often a direct word-for-word translation can miss the mark if the legal systems differ. Maintain a glossary of such terms to ensure consistency and document how each was handled. It's also wise to add a brief explanation in parentheses or footnotes when the concept has no perfect local match, so nothing is lost on the reader. In short, treat these translations as interpretations of meaning, not just language, to avoid misunderstandings or legal confusion.

Question 5

Does high volume of mentions always mean high brand relevance?

Accepted Answer

No, a high volume of brand mentions doesn't always equate to high brand relevance - it really depends on who's talking and why. Sometimes a spike in mentions comes from a viral joke or a controversy, which might boost visibility but not in ways that drive genuine interest or sales. A brand could be all over social media for a day, yet the conversation might be superficial or negative, contributing little to true relevance with its target customers. Conversely, a smaller volume of discussion in a focused community (like experts or loyal users) can mean a brand is deeply relevant in that niche, even if it's not trending broadly. That's why marketers look at sentiment and context of mentions, not just count - quality of engagement often matters more than quantity when assessing brand relevance.

STRAT7 Researchbods

Why choose Us

What is STRAT7 Researchbods?

Research Software and Platform Details

Market Research Products

ex-plor