Enlightn CEO Adrien Vermeirsch discusses sample quality, respondent fraud, AI-moderated research, an...
Partner Content
3 min read
Quant’s appeal was speed and cost, not always significance. Discover why using large samples by default can lead to wasted insights.
Explore market research breakthroughs: Fair Response boosts sample quality, NVIDIA leads in syntheti...
9 min read
Learn the importance of sample size and fraud prevention in research. How optimal sampling enhances data reliability and fraud mitigation maintains in...
6 min read
Explore essential sampling methods in market research. Learn how random, stratified, and cluster sampling provide representative data for strategic in...
9 min read
Explore the world of synthetic data for decision-making. Fuel research with experiments and simulations while maintaining privacy and statistical prop...
12 min read
Explore the theoretical foundations and limitations of significance tests in survey research with our comprehensive overview.
3 min read
Insights professionals must restore trust in market research data while continuing to reduce costs and timelines without sacrificing quality. Used res...
4 min read
This article discusses how the online sampling ecosystem favors professional respondents and bad actors. It advocates for a transformative shift towar...
5 min read
If you can’t trust the data from your research, what’s the point? Most researchers are aware of numerous biases that can affect survey results. Most o...
4 min read
“You surveyed only N = 1000 respondents. How can these results be representative of the entire country with a population of millions?” If you’ve wonde...
4 min read
Corrupted data can defeat the missions that drive survey efforts. Bad data can lead executives to invest in the wrong expansion areas, marketing teams...
4 min read
Today’s consumers are overflowed with product choices, constantly pinging smartphones, and that pot of pasta that is about to boil over. It’s your lif...
3 min read
We marketing researchers can create quite complex data systems that start to push the limits of formulas in stat textbooks to determine confidence int...
2 min read
It’s 2022, and the economy is just as uncertain as it was in the historic 2020. Enterprises are rethinking their approach to strategy and streamlining...
2 min read
In today’s world, the reduction in time allowed between end of field, production of results and presentation to stakeholders, is often so short that a...
2 min read
Panel sample is what keeps the market research industry going. But as an industry, we are only as good as that sample’s level of quality. We face a wi...
2 min read
Human behavior change has accelerated rapidly over the past two years, the COVID-19 pandemic forcing adaptation, rewiring brains, and forming new habi...
3 min read
MR that taps into a deep pool of populations reveals valuable insight.
4 min read
The Swiss Cheese Model of Pandemic Defense applied to survey fraud.
4 min read
The importance of validating phone numbers in samples.
5 min read
Similar to the realm of video streaming services, the MR sample space faces increased fragmentation.
6 min read
Discussing how to find the right respondents for your market research.
3 min read
Respondent experience remains key to producing quality sample data.
1 min read
A discussion on panel sample with market research industry leaders.
5 min read
The insights industry is facing a global supply shortage.
3 min read
Layering a quality-control approach produced high-quality data.
9 min read
The more data we have, the more reliably quality management tools can predict quality and the faster we can prevent fraud.
10 min read
The three-building blocks you need to master to build a reliable, representative online sample platform.
13 min read
Observational data is a tempting shortcut for insights but researchers must consider its potential shortfalls
5 min read
Should we ever be ok with “just good enough” when it comes to phone interviews?
4 min read
Sample suppliers must increase the transparency of sample recruitment and the use of technology in providing quality sample.
5 min read
Four years after the provocative article & observations from the insides of the online sample machinery.
5 min read
More researchers are turning away from massive surveys and are embracing the power of actual conversations
4 min read
Lack of transparency in sample supply is bad for everyone, thus a sample marketplace can potentially solve many challenges
6 min read
Technology is both a friend and an enemy when it comes to the problem of sample fraud. Steps must be implemented to combat the problem.
4 min read
Discussion on the opportunities, hype, and applications of blockchain in MR
5 min read
3 forward-looking solutions to the issue of sample quality
1 min read
Help benchmark the views of qualitative researchers and share your experiences on research participant recruitment.

4 min read
The latest GRIT Report delves into the topic of sample quality, and whether technology is improving the situation or making matters worse.

6 min read
We have to overcome a common misconception about what mobile research really is, and what it can accomplish.

5 min read
Sample quality from online panels is an issue everyone knows about but no one wants to address.

3 min read
Frank Kelly explains how the quality of your research relies on the source of your respondents.

8 min read
Ron Sellers questions the opinion that research quality is the worst it has ever been. It is an ongoing battle, not a recent development.

9 min read
Why is nobody here addressing the elephant in the room? It’s not just sample quality. It’s survey quality.

3 min read
I’ve seen a lot of discussion on various boards and blogs about making surveys more fascinating for respondents, in order to encourage higher response...

4 min read
by Bill Weylock, Action Insights – First session of my afternoon: relative projectibility and sampling reliability. REI determined that the rising per...

2 min read
As providers, it is our responsibility to provide quality participants and enable clients to accurately identify good and bad respondents.