Question 1

When are eye-tracking studies most valuable in in-store environments?

Accepted Answer

Eye-tracking is most valuable in-store when visual attention is directly linked to the outcome you care about - usually in contexts like shelf layout optimization, packaging design, or point-of-sale signage. For example, if you're concerned that a new product or promotion isn't being noticed on the shelf, an eye-tracking study can confirm exactly what shoppers see (and ignore) as they scan the display. It's particularly useful before major in-store changes: if you're about to reset a category or introduce new packaging, eye-tracking can validate whether your key items and messages catch the eye in the few seconds shoppers spend in front of that section. Essentially, use it when you need hard evidence of visibility: Are shoppers actually looking at the end-cap display? Do they read that shelf tag or promotional sign? Because eye-tracking requires special hardware and setup, it delivers the best value when those specific questions of "What draws attention?" will inform a big decision (like layout revisions or packaging tweaks). That's when the investment in eye-tracking is justified by the clarity it provides.

Question 2

What permissions do I need to record and transcribe focus group sessions?

Accepted Answer

You should obtain explicit consent from participants before recording any focus group session or creating transcripts. Typically this means having each participant sign a consent form (or agree via a digital form) that clearly states the discussion will be audio/video recorded and later transcribed. The consent should cover how the recordings and transcripts will be used, stored, and shared. In many jurisdictions it's a legal requirement that all parties are aware of and agree to being recorded (so-called "two-party consent"). Additionally, if the focus group is being held in a rented facility, ensure the venue allows recording. By securing written permission from participants and meeting any local privacy laws (for example, GDPR in Europe), you protect both the participants' rights and your organization from legal issues.

Question 3

When should win-loss learnings update personas and segmentation?

Accepted Answer

Win-loss analysis learnings should feed into your buyer personas and market segmentation whenever they reveal a meaningful shift in who buys and why. If repeated win-loss reviews show, for instance, that a new customer type (maybe mid-market firms in a certain industry) is emerging with different priorities, it's a signal to update your personas. You want your sales and marketing collateral to reflect reality, so periodically--perhaps annually or after major market changes--compare persona assumptions to win-loss findings. Also, if a particular segment consistently shows higher win rates or losses, refine how you define that segment or alter your strategy for it. Basically, whenever win-loss data uncovers traits or motivations not captured in your current personas or segments, it's time to refresh them so you stay aligned with the actual market dynamics.

Question 4

How do we capture unmet needs without leading or priming?

Accepted Answer

To uncover unmet needs without leading participants, use open-ended and observational research methods that let people reveal their challenges in their own words. For example, instead of asking a leading question like "Would feature X help you?", you ask them to describe a recent difficult experience or a workaround they use in the relevant area. Techniques such as in-depth interviews, diary studies, or ethnographic observation encourage participants to talk about their routine and pain points naturally, bringing up needs you didn't explicitly mention. Moderators remain neutral and probe gently with follow-ups ("Can you tell me more about that?" or "Why was that frustrating?") rather than suggesting solutions. By giving people the space to explain problems and desires on their own, you capture authentic unmet needs without priming or biasing them with your assumptions.

Question 5

Does follower count always equate to influence in research decisions?

Accepted Answer

No - a high follower count doesn't automatically equal influence in research or decision-making; it's the quality and relevance of one's followers and content that matter. In today's social media environment, someone might have millions of followers due to entertainment value or broad appeal, but if you're researching, say, a niche B2B software trend, a person with 500 deeply engaged, domain-relevant followers could sway that discussion more. Influence is better gauged by metrics like engagement rate (do people actually interact, comment, or share the person's posts?), audience fit (are the followers in the field or market you care about), and trust or credibility signals. For instance, an industry expert cited frequently by peers has more real influence than an internet celebrity with passive followers. So, while follower count can signal reach, effective research decisions look beyond the raw number - focusing on who is listening and acting - to identify true influencers.

Conifer Research

Why choose Us

Features and attributes

What is Conifer Research?

Recognition

Services and Expertise

Published on Greenbook

Cracker Jack Gems of Innovation Jargon

Understanding Consumer Behavior and Habits through Frameworks for Change

Ethnography: Does Remote Research Really Count?

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

When are eye-tracking studies most valuable in in-store environments?

What permissions do I need to record and transcribe focus group sessions?

When should win-loss learnings update personas and segmentation?

How do we capture unmet needs without leading or priming?

Does follower count always equate to influence in research decisions?