Question 1

When should insights teams play a role in strategy communication?

Accepted Answer

Insights teams should be involved in strategy communication as early as possible — both during strategy development and when the strategy is being rolled out — whenever data is needed to back up the message. In practice, this means when leaders are communicating a major strategic decision or shift, the insights team plays a role by presenting the research and evidence that supports it. For example, if a company is shifting focus to a new customer segment, an insights professional might share key survey results or market trends during the announcement to explain why that segment was chosen. By contributing to strategy communication (through presentations, reports, or Q&A sessions), the insights team helps translate data into a clear narrative, making the strategy more credible and understandable to stakeholders. In short, any time strategic decisions are communicated to the broader organization or clients, involving the insights team ensures those communications are grounded in evidence and resonate with the audience's need for rationale.

Question 2

What ethical concerns arise when forecasting consumer behavior with AI?

Accepted Answer

Using AI to predict consumer behavior raises several ethical flags, mainly around bias, privacy, and accountability. One concern is that the algorithms may learn from historical data that contain biases - for example, disproportionately under-predicting interest from certain demographic groups - thus reinforcing unfair treatment_x000D_. Privacy is another issue: forecasting models often ingest large amounts of personal consumer data, so if that data was collected without clear consent or isn't handled securely, it violates trust. There's also the opacity problem: AI forecasts can be a "black box," making it hard to explain to stakeholders (or consumers) why a certain prediction was made, which complicates accountability. Finally, there's the risk of self-fulfilling prophecies or manipulation: if companies act on AI predictions in heavy-handed ways, they might inadvertently limit consumer choice or target people in ways that feel invasive. In short, fairness, transparency, and respecting consumer data rights are key ethical considerations when using AI for behavior forecasting.

Question 3

How are global supply chain shifts affecting access to B2B audiences?

Accepted Answer

Global supply chain disruptions and realignments have made some Business-to-Business (B2B) audiences harder to reach and changed how researchers engage them. Companies shifting to local suppliers or diversifying partners create new stakeholder groups that may not be in traditional contact lists. For example, a firm that nearshores production could rely on smaller regional suppliers who aren't yet on industry panels, making them tougher to recruit. Researchers must adapt recruitment — leveraging professional networks or digital outreach — to find these emerging decision-makers. A pitfall is assuming old B2B panels still apply, as supply chain upheavals mean key voices might have moved to different regions or new companies. By updating sampling frames and staying attuned to industry shifts, studies can still reach the right experts despite the volatility.

Question 4

Does high website traffic always indicate strong purchase intent?

Accepted Answer

No — high website traffic doesn't automatically mean strong purchase intent. You can attract a large number of visitors who are merely browsing, researching, or drawn by content without any immediate intention to buy. For example, a viral blog post or broad marketing campaign might spike your site visits, but many of those people could leave after a quick look or bounce from your homepage without engaging further. What really signals purchase intent are quality metrics: how long visitors stay on product pages, whether they add items to cart, download information, or fill out inquiry forms. In short, a smaller volume of highly engaged, qualified traffic is far more valuable than a huge influx of unqualified clicks, so marketers should look beyond raw traffic numbers to gauge true intent.

Question 5

How do I make a credible business case for ethnography versus surveys?

Accepted Answer

To justify ethnography (immersive observational research) versus just surveys, highlight what unique value it provides and how that translates to business outcomes. Emphasize that ethnography uncovers the "why" and unspoken behaviors that surveys often miss. For example, maybe surveys showed decent satisfaction scores, but an ethnographic study revealed customers struggling with a product in their daily context - a hidden pain point that, once solved, significantly increased retention or sales. Frame these insights in dollar terms or KPIs: the improvement might reduce churn by X% or open a new market segment, adding tangible value. Also compare costs: ethnography is more upfront investment, but point out how much a failed product launch or a misread customer need would cost the company (often far more than a few field studies). By providing a concrete success story and a clear ROI argument (value gained vs. research cost), you'll make a compelling, credible case that ethnography isn't a "nice-to-have" but a strategic necessity for deeper insights that drive growth and prevent costly missteps.

C+R Research

Why choose Us

Features and attributes

What is C+R Research?

Recognition

Market Research Products

ShopperEyes®

CultureBeat

Services and Expertise

Published on Greenbook

National Pork Board Uses Reinvented A+U to Understand the Demand Landscape for Pork

Research Resources

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

When should insights teams play a role in strategy communication?

What ethical concerns arise when forecasting consumer behavior with AI?

How are global supply chain shifts affecting access to B2B audiences?

Does high website traffic always indicate strong purchase intent?

How do I make a credible business case for ethnography versus surveys?