Question 1

When should we cap frequency to avoid creative fatigue and waste?

Accepted Answer

Cap campaign frequency when key engagement metrics plateau or turn negative, indicating creative fatigue has set in. Too many ad exposures after this inflection point waste budget and can even irritate your audience. Monitoring diminishing returns on metrics — like a drop in click-through rate or conversion lift beyond a certain number of impressions — helps pinpoint when additional frequency stops adding value. For example, if brand recall or favorability scores stagnate despite more impressions, it's a clear signal the ad's effectiveness has peaked. Imposing a frequency cap at that stage preserves media efficiency and ensures your message stays fresh, balancing necessary repetition with audience tolerance. Many campaigns find that capping around 3-5 impressions per user per week is effective once performance tapers, though optimal levels vary by context and creative strength.

Question 2

What's a safe way to test sensitive claims without leading?

Accepted Answer

To test a sensitive claim in research without leading respondents, present the claim neutrally and use indirect questioning techniques that don't imply a "right" answer. For example, rather than asking something leading like "Don't you find this claim convincing?", you might show the claim in context (e.g., as part of a concept or ad) and then ask, "What's your reaction to this statement?" or "How does this claim make you feel?" These open-ended, non-judgmental prompts let people express concerns or skepticism freely. Using monadic testing - having participants evaluate the claim in isolation rather than comparing multiple claims at once - can also help avoid bias by keeping them focused. It's important to assure anonymity and emphasize that there are no wrong answers to encourage candor. By keeping wording neutral and questions open, you get honest feedback on sensitive claims without steering respondents.

Question 3

When does a strong product concept fail to achieve marketplace success?

Accepted Answer

A product concept that seems strong can fail in the marketplace if execution and market conditions don't support it, revealing that a great idea on paper isn't enough on its own. For example, a concept might test extremely well with consumers, but if the actual product is poorly executed (say, quality issues or missing key features) or priced too high, customers will not buy in. Market factors can also derail it — weak distribution, lack of marketing support, or a competitor releasing a similar offering can sap a strong concept's momentum. Sometimes the research environment doesn't capture real-world behavior: people may love an idea in a survey but then stick with what they know when it comes time to purchase. In essence, even the best concept needs proper execution, timing, and market fit; if those elements falter, it can still fall short of marketplace success.

Question 4

What practices improve reliability in price elasticity studies?

Accepted Answer

To improve reliability in price elasticity studies, design the research to mimic real-world buying conditions and force realistic trade-offs. Use scenarios that simulate actual purchase environments: for instance, show products alongside competitors or within a budget, so respondents react as they would while shopping. Advanced techniques like choice-based conjoint or simulated purchase experiments yield more stable data than simply asking "Would you buy at $X?" because they capture true trade-offs, especially if you randomize price presentations to avoid order bias. Finally, whenever possible, cross-validate survey findings with real sales or past data to ensure the elasticity estimates align with actual behavior. By grounding the study in realism and validating the output, you'll get price elasticity insights you can trust for decision-making.

Question 5

When should search data serve as proxy for salience or mental availability?

Accepted Answer

Search data can serve as a proxy for brand salience or mental availability when consumer interest naturally translates into online searches. In practice, this works best in categories where people habitually research products or brands — if consumers tend to Google a solution when it's on their mind, then rising search volumes for a brand or keyword indicate it's becoming more top-of-mind. For example, after a big ad campaign or news event, a spike in branded search queries often signals increased mental availability (people are hearing the brand and looking it up). Marketers should use search as a proxy mainly when there's a strong link between awareness and search behavior; for a low-consideration product that nobody bothers searching for, search volume isn't very telling about salience.

The Sound Research UA Inc.

Why choose Us

Features and attributes

What is The Sound Research UA Inc.?

Services and Expertise

Published on Greenbook

Remembering Research Fundamentals in the Age of COVID-19

Client Projects and Success Stories

Research Resources

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

When should we cap frequency to avoid creative fatigue and waste?

What's a safe way to test sensitive claims without leading?

When does a strong product concept fail to achieve marketplace success?

What practices improve reliability in price elasticity studies?

When should search data serve as proxy for salience or mental availability?