Question 1

How does research via online portals differ from call-center journey research?

Accepted Answer

Researching an online self-service portal versus a call-center journey requires different approaches and reveals different issues. For an online portal, you rely on digital analytics and UX testing: track where users click and drop off, and use on-page surveys or usability tests to learn why. This might show, for example, that many users abandon the process at a specific step, pointing to a UI or content issue on that page. The insights here are about navigation, design, and information clarity. For a call-center journey, you turn to conversation analysis and service metrics: listen to call recordings or read transcripts to identify common frustrations, and note operational factors like if calls are getting transferred multiple times or taking too long. This can reveal issues such as customers having to repeat themselves or unclear processes that lead to long handle times. In short, portal research highlights where the self-service experience is confusing or failing, while call-center research highlights where the human support experience needs improvement. Both perspectives together give you a more complete picture of the customer journey.

Question 2

When is a virtual shelf test preferable to an in-store pilot?

Accepted Answer

A virtual shelf test is preferable to an in-store pilot when you need to test quickly, cost-effectively, or in an early concept phase without the logistics of a physical store setup. In a virtual shelf simulation, you can expose consumers to different packaging, pricing, or shelf layouts digitally and get feedback within days. This approach makes sense before a real store trial because you can iterate through multiple concepts fast and identify the most promising ones. It's also useful if an in-store test is impractical — say, due to timing (avoiding key retail seasons) or not wanting to tip off competitors. By using virtual testing to narrow options and gather initial consumer reactions, you save time and money and only move the best concepts to an in-store pilot for final validation.

Question 3

What are the best tools to achieve organizational alignment?

Accepted Answer

The best tools for organizational alignment include shared goal-setting frameworks and collaborative platforms that keep everyone focused on common objectives and metrics. For instance, many companies use Objectives and Key Results (OKR) software or company-wide strategy dashboards (a modern digital take on the balanced scorecard) to align goals across teams, combined with communication tools like Slack or Microsoft Teams to share updates and feedback in real time. Knowledge management systems (like an internal wiki or intranet portal) also play a role by centralizing important information and insights so all departments reference the same source of truth; the key is to use tools that make strategic priorities, progress, and accountability visible company-wide and to encourage regular cross-functional communication, ensuring every team moves in the same direction.

Question 4

What regulations govern collecting data on race, ethnicity, or gender identity?

Accepted Answer

Data on race, ethnicity, or gender identity is considered sensitive personal information in most jurisdictions and is tightly regulated. In the EU, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) labels these as special category data, meaning you must have explicit consent and a clear purpose to collect them, along with strong safeguards. In the US, there's no single overarching law, but various rules apply: for example, employers gathering diversity data follow Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) guidelines, and researchers typically need informed consent when asking such questions. Some state privacy laws like California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) also treat race or ethnicity as sensitive data, giving individuals rights to be notified and to opt out. Many other countries' privacy laws similarly require consent and special handling for collecting racial or ethnic information. Overall, whenever you collect data on race, ethnicity, or gender identity, you should clearly justify why, obtain voluntary consent, and keep the data confidential-used only for its stated purpose. Ethical research standards likewise say participants must be told why those questions are asked and free to skip them.

Question 5

Will supply volatility change priorities in B2B spec decisions?

Accepted Answer

Yes - recent supply volatility is forcing B2B companies to rethink their spec priorities, putting more weight on supplier reliability and flexibility rather than just cost or performance alone. Where previously price and technical specs might have dominated decisions, now factors like lead time, supply chain resilience, and the ability to source materials from multiple suppliers have moved to the forefront. For example, a manufacturer might choose a component that's slightly less advanced or a bit pricier if it comes from a supplier with a proven stable supply and shorter delivery times, in order to avoid production stoppages. Companies are also building more flexibility into their specs — choosing materials or designs that can be supplied by several vendors instead of a single source — and considering inventory strategies (like keeping safety stock) as part of the decision. In short, supply instability has elevated reliability, supplier diversity, and risk mitigation as key criteria in B2B specification decisions, often outweighing a narrow focus on lowest cost or cutting-edge performance.

Qlarity Access

Why choose Us

What is Qlarity Access?

Market Research Products

Ag Access

Vet Access

Services and Expertise

Research Resources

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

How does research via online portals differ from call-center journey research?

When is a virtual shelf test preferable to an in-store pilot?

What are the best tools to achieve organizational alignment?

What regulations govern collecting data on race, ethnicity, or gender identity?

Will supply volatility change priorities in B2B spec decisions?